If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Scott numbering system
Scott numbering system is about to send me to the funny farm where all
good wackos go. Example: Catalog note after Scott 2597, "Nos. 2595-2597 also available in strips spaced for use in affixing machines to service first day covers." In my opinion that is a coil strip and needs a number, Scott doesn't think so. Another problem; Reissue vs Reprint. I see the reprint as the same stamp reprinted, the reissue is a new stamp with a new date. The reissues deserve a new number, Scott doesn't think so. I will have to stop putting forth so much effort to correctly number my stamps. Those Flag Over Porch issues almost finished off the OLD one. Ralphael, the OLD one |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Scott numbering system
"Ralphael1" Another problem; Reissue vs Reprint. I see the reprint as the same stamp reprinted, the reissue is a new stamp with a new date. The reissues deserve a new number, Scott doesn't think so. Same as the Hungarian dated reprints. Take Malcolm's advice and use your own cat numbering. I use my own for the Paraguay (and others) Appendix stamps and the Fischer numbering system for Eastern Silesia because there are no Gibbons numbers http://cjoint.com/data/hDcueBq5c4.htm etc etc. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Scott numbering system
On 29 July, 02:24, "rodney" pookiethai@NOSPAM iprimus.com.au wrote:
"Ralphael1" Another problem; Reissue vs Reprint. I see the reprint as the same stamp reprinted, the reissue is a new stamp with a new date. The reissues deserve a new number, Scott doesn't think so. Same as the Hungarian dated reprints. Take Malcolm's advice and use your own cat numbering. I use my own for the Paraguay (and others) *Appendix stamps and the Fischer numbering system for Eastern Silesia because there are no Gibbons numbershttp://cjoint.com/data/hDcueBq5c4.htm etc etc. Yes there are (but maybe not in Simplified or eqvt.):- Top left: 58 if overprint 9.25-9.5mm high, or 58b if 8.5mm high Top right: 59 or 59b likewise. Bottom left: 63 if distance between fullstops on S and O is 6mm, 63b if it's 5.25mm Bottom Right: 65 or 65b likewise. Unexciting CVs. Chris |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Scott numbering system
well there's a nice surprise.
thank you. Yes there are (but maybe not in Simplified or eqvt.):- Top left: 58 if overprint 9.25-9.5mm high, or 58b if 8.5mm high Top right: 59 or 59b likewise. Bottom left: 63 if distance between fullstops on S and O is 6mm, 63b if it's 5.25mm Bottom Right: 65 or 65b likewise. Unexciting CVs. Chris |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Scott numbering system
Looks like I owe an apology, Jill has just upbraided me for not noticing it in Gibbons. It indeed appears on Page 1 no less, of the SOTW E-J Never seen that before. Thanks. "rodney" pookiethai@NOSPAM iprimus.com.au wrote in message ... well there's a nice surprise. thank you. Yes there are (but maybe not in Simplified or eqvt.):- Top left: 58 if overprint 9.25-9.5mm high, or 58b if 8.5mm high Top right: 59 or 59b likewise. Bottom left: 63 if distance between fullstops on S and O is 6mm, 63b if it's 5.25mm Bottom Right: 65 or 65b likewise. Unexciting CVs. Chris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2002 up new numbering system | Ralphael1 | General Discussion | 4 | July 5th 06 01:54 PM |
NGC's numbering system question | Steve M | Coins | 2 | September 23rd 05 04:41 PM |
Restoration system for Scott International's | wolfb | General Discussion | 5 | June 29th 05 01:09 PM |
Curiosity Corner #186: China's numbering system. | Rodney | General Discussion | 0 | February 19th 05 09:25 PM |
More on Waterman numbering system | BLandolf | Pens & Pencils | 0 | December 26th 03 01:54 AM |