If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 18:21:57 +1200, "Dave Joll"
found these unused words floating about: malcolm hirst wrote Someone mentioned that the catalogue price is a comparison price. This is also not true. Take a simple example GB commemoratives in Gibbons. At the present time you can buy recent letter rate commemoratives in kiloware relatively cheaply - yet these are catalogued at at least 50p plus each. This is because Gibbons' catalogue prices are for superb examples with small, tidy, CDS type cancellations. You will probably find that 99% of stamps in kiloware have wavy line or slogan type cancellations. These would be priced much lower. Sorry ... but SG specifically states: "The prices quoted ... for examples in fine condition for the issue concerned. Superb examples are worth more; those os a lower quality considrably less." Beginning with SG 17 they additionally note for each group/period something on the order of: "17/35a ... For well-centred, lightly used ... +125%" |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
J. A. Mc. wrote
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 18:21:57 +1200, "Dave Joll" malcolm hirst wrote Someone mentioned that the catalogue price is a comparison price. This is also not true. Take a simple example GB commemoratives in Gibbons. At the present time you can buy recent letter rate commemoratives in kiloware relatively cheaply - yet these are catalogued at at least 50p plus each. This is because Gibbons' catalogue prices are for superb examples with small, tidy, CDS type cancellations. You will probably find that 99% of stamps in kiloware have wavy line or slogan type cancellations. These would be priced much lower. Sorry ... but SG specifically states: "The prices quoted ... for examples in fine condition for the issue concerned. Superb examples are worth more; those os a lower quality considrably less." Beginning with SG 17 they additionally note for each group/period something on the order of: "17/35a ... For well-centred, lightly used ... +125%" Catalogues at 20 paces, it seems... :-) My Part 1 states: "USED PRICES. For Nos. 515 onwards the used prices quoted are for examples with circular dated postmarks". Note that Malcolm mentioned recent letter rate commemoratives, not "classics". - Dave -- Lowering the tone of Usenet since 1997... Please send replies to New Zealand instead of Zanzibar. Sorry, but the spam is just getting a little too much... |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 13:12:38 +1200, "Dave Joll"
found these unused words floating about: J. A. Mc. wrote On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 18:21:57 +1200, "Dave Joll" malcolm hirst wrote Someone mentioned that the catalogue price is a comparison price. This is also not true. Take a simple example GB commemoratives in Gibbons. At the present time you can buy recent letter rate commemoratives in kiloware relatively cheaply - yet these are catalogued at at least 50p plus each. This is because Gibbons' catalogue prices are for superb examples with small, tidy, CDS type cancellations. You will probably find that 99% of stamps in kiloware have wavy line or slogan type cancellations. These would be priced much lower. Sorry ... but SG specifically states: "The prices quoted ... for examples in fine condition for the issue concerned. Superb examples are worth more; those os a lower quality considrably less." Beginning with SG 17 they additionally note for each group/period something on the order of: "17/35a ... For well-centred, lightly used ... +125%" Catalogues at 20 paces, it seems... :-) My Part 1 states: "USED PRICES. For Nos. 515 onwards the used prices quoted are for examples with circular dated postmarks". Note that Malcolm mentioned recent letter rate commemoratives, not "classics". Guess you missed the part that said: " fine condition for the issue concerned." That's in the 'master' notes about the whole catalogue. Subsequent 'notes' modify as you noted "For Nos. 515 onward", but don't replace. Nothing in the later notes says "Superb" as a condition. He also used a 'simple example', but the notes in a catalogue should (and do) apply as stated to the whole work, until modified as the listing progresses for -each- country. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Mdvanii & Rhogit catalogues 1992 | Marie-Carmen | Dolls | 1 | April 12th 06 06:58 PM |
Wanted Stanley Gibbons catalogues | A. R. Taylor | Worldwide Stamps | 0 | January 9th 04 12:10 PM |
FA: old ancient coin sale catalogues | hunlsi | Coins | 0 | November 9th 03 03:00 PM |
FA: ancient coin auction catalogues & Celator back issues & world coins | hunlsi | Coins | 0 | October 22nd 03 03:22 PM |
Wanted Stanley Gibbons Stamp catalogues | A. R. Taylor | Worldwide Stamps | 0 | August 3rd 03 10:54 AM |