A collecting forum. CollectingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » CollectingBanter forum » Stamps » General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Responsibilities of Catalogues



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old July 26th 03, 05:36 PM
J. A. Mc.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 18:21:57 +1200, "Dave Joll"
found these unused words floating about:

malcolm hirst wrote

Someone mentioned that the catalogue price is a comparison price. This
is also not true. Take a simple example GB commemoratives in Gibbons.
At the present time you can buy recent letter rate commemoratives in
kiloware relatively cheaply - yet these are catalogued at at least 50p
plus each.


This is because Gibbons' catalogue prices are for superb
examples with small, tidy, CDS type cancellations. You
will probably find that 99% of stamps in kiloware have
wavy line or slogan type cancellations. These would be
priced much lower.


Sorry ... but SG specifically states:

"The prices quoted ... for examples in fine condition for the issue
concerned. Superb examples are worth more; those os a lower quality
considrably less."

Beginning with SG 17 they additionally note for each group/period
something on the order of:

"17/35a ... For well-centred, lightly used ... +125%"


Ads
  #22  
Old July 27th 03, 02:12 AM
Dave Joll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

J. A. Mc. wrote

On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 18:21:57 +1200, "Dave Joll"


malcolm hirst wrote


Someone mentioned that the catalogue price is a comparison price. This
is also not true. Take a simple example GB commemoratives in Gibbons.
At the present time you can buy recent letter rate commemoratives in
kiloware relatively cheaply - yet these are catalogued at at least 50p
plus each.


This is because Gibbons' catalogue prices are for superb
examples with small, tidy, CDS type cancellations. You
will probably find that 99% of stamps in kiloware have
wavy line or slogan type cancellations. These would be
priced much lower.


Sorry ... but SG specifically states:
"The prices quoted ... for examples in fine condition for the issue
concerned. Superb examples are worth more; those os a lower quality
considrably less."
Beginning with SG 17 they additionally note for each group/period
something on the order of:
"17/35a ... For well-centred, lightly used ... +125%"


Catalogues at 20 paces, it seems... :-)

My Part 1 states: "USED PRICES. For Nos. 515 onwards the
used prices quoted are for examples with circular dated postmarks".
Note that Malcolm mentioned recent letter rate commemoratives,
not "classics".

- Dave
--
Lowering the tone of Usenet since 1997...

Please send replies to New Zealand instead of Zanzibar.
Sorry, but the spam is just getting a little too much...


  #23  
Old July 27th 03, 07:46 PM
J. A. Mc.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 13:12:38 +1200, "Dave Joll"
found these unused words floating about:

J. A. Mc. wrote

On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 18:21:57 +1200, "Dave Joll"


malcolm hirst wrote


Someone mentioned that the catalogue price is a comparison price. This
is also not true. Take a simple example GB commemoratives in Gibbons.
At the present time you can buy recent letter rate commemoratives in
kiloware relatively cheaply - yet these are catalogued at at least 50p
plus each.


This is because Gibbons' catalogue prices are for superb
examples with small, tidy, CDS type cancellations. You
will probably find that 99% of stamps in kiloware have
wavy line or slogan type cancellations. These would be
priced much lower.


Sorry ... but SG specifically states:
"The prices quoted ... for examples in fine condition for the issue
concerned. Superb examples are worth more; those os a lower quality
considrably less."
Beginning with SG 17 they additionally note for each group/period
something on the order of:
"17/35a ... For well-centred, lightly used ... +125%"


Catalogues at 20 paces, it seems... :-)

My Part 1 states: "USED PRICES. For Nos. 515 onwards the
used prices quoted are for examples with circular dated postmarks".
Note that Malcolm mentioned recent letter rate commemoratives,
not "classics".

Guess you missed the part that said:
" fine condition for the issue concerned."

That's in the 'master' notes about the whole catalogue. Subsequent
'notes' modify as you noted "For Nos. 515 onward", but don't replace.
Nothing in the later notes says "Superb" as a condition.

He also used a 'simple example', but the notes in a catalogue should
(and do) apply as stated to the whole work, until modified as the
listing progresses for -each- country.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Mdvanii & Rhogit catalogues 1992 Marie-Carmen Dolls 1 April 12th 06 06:58 PM
Wanted Stanley Gibbons catalogues A. R. Taylor Worldwide Stamps 0 January 9th 04 12:10 PM
FA: old ancient coin sale catalogues hunlsi Coins 0 November 9th 03 03:00 PM
FA: ancient coin auction catalogues & Celator back issues & world coins hunlsi Coins 0 October 22nd 03 03:22 PM
Wanted Stanley Gibbons Stamp catalogues A. R. Taylor Worldwide Stamps 0 August 3rd 03 10:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CollectingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.