If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Needed: Ink Recommendations for Sheaffer Nonsense Fountain Pen!
On Jun 9, 3:37*pm, MatthewK wrote:
I can't speak for the others but an hour spent googling the vp will give you a couple of results. How great the pen is. Why doesn't it work well with this ink, why doesn't it work well * with this converter, why is it so noisy? Do you think that may be partially to do with the fact that someone that shells out $300 might have slightly higher expectations than someone who puts out $14.95? The cheapest I've seen a new vp is $88-$160. I expect a pen that costly to work without a hitch but the rest of the market is satisfied with poor engineering and materials. OK, if you buy a $7 parker and it doesn't write well, how many forums are you going to run to in order to post your bad experience? Again, expectations are higher in the upper price ranges, people will work harder to get them fixed/replaced, disappointment runs deeper, and forum posts increase. That does not mean people are satisfied with poor engineering, not a bit. It means that you find more posts because people paid more. How many posts do you read that say "Just bought a VP and it works fine" I think pilot is the wrong brand to discuss, because to a certain extent their pens seem to all be very similar in terms of hardware regardless of price. How many nib/feed assemblies do the manufacture? Anyone know? In the higher end, they have a whole bunch of different mechanisms, including a plunger (823) and a piston (845). They also have eyedroppers, etc. The workmanship on Japanese pens, in my experience, is fantastic, particularly Pilots and Sailors. As a rule of thumb I think $40 bucks or less is what newbies should here. I didn't mean to apply that to all situations. You don't get a gold nib less than $75, and that is a different writing experience than a steel nib. Just because you are a newbie doesn't mean you have to settle for a steel nib. To me, it is simple marketing. Just restricting ourselves to japanese makers what is more likely to write flawlessly out of the box, a namiki vp or a platinum preppy? What would write better out of the box, a pelikano or something in the $400 dollar range? What does write "better" mean? If you are asking me what feels better for me to write with, an Omas Paragon or a Pelikano, I would answer it after I got done laughing. A company can "eat it" on 100 $400 dollar pens but not a million $10 dollar pens. If school pens were bad writers many of the pen companies would have been out of business fast. That is not to be taken literally but it seems once you get to the $100 dollar mark, bad things start happening. Yes, please don't take that literally because literally none of my several $100 pens ever gave me a poor experience. Zero. Zip. Zilch. They were love affairs right out of the box as soon as they were inked and write better than the $100 pens. However, I believe that's because their gold nibs give a better experience overall than do steel nibs rather than it being an issue of not writing on demand. Gold nibs being better? That is surely personal bias. I think your lucky to have had no problems. There really aren't many production pens that don't need adjusting out of the box. The cheap ones have statistical quality controll going for them as well as gross economics. I'm curious about how cheap ones have statistical quality controls that more expensive ones don't have? Because they make more, that means they are better quality? Well, not really. It is true that in the upper end fountain pens, there are a lot of hand made components, and yes, handmade components aren't as likely to be as consistent as machine made components. But this is why we have pen retailers - we sit in front of our pen retailer, we fill the pen with ink, we try the pen before we buy it, the retailer makes adjustments (well a good retailer anyway). My personal taste takes me to pens generally in the $200+ range (although I haven't bought a modern pen in a while, I prefer vintage) - I like the size of a large pen, and a large gold nib. I prefer piston filling systems. I've had one pen not work for me, and I've had to adjust the flow of ink to my liking in a few. But I'm not with you on the notion that a $40 pen writes better than a $400 pen just.... because it does. |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Needed: Ink Recommendations for Sheaffer Nonsense Fountain Pen!
"titanic cruise? I think not; much safer on a ruby yacht" wrote in message ... FOOEY!! I spilled ink on my computer. Will I have asdf creep? Maybe, maybe not. Maybe it'll be the qwerty creep. -- ~~Bluesea~~ Spam is great in musubi, but not in email. Please take out the trash before sending a direct reply. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Needed: Ink Recommendations for Sheaffer Nonsense Fountain Pen!
"The Drunken Lord" wrote in message ... I agree with your basic idea, that cheap pens are just as good. Yes. "You get what you pay for" does not apply to fps as far as basic performance, does-it-work, goes. Thing is, I don't have any $2,000 pens around here to compare them with. But, aren't $2,000 pens classified as collectibles? Since collectibles aren't intended to be used, it isn't fair to compare how well they perform out of the box to daily writers. I do have a duofold, and I don't know how much that is worth. It has a gold nib and writes maybe--not really sure--maybe better, a little better--smoother or something--but like I said, if I were blindfolded, I don't know that I'd know the difference between that pen and a Phileas. Since what touches paper is the tipping material, gold doesn't play as a factor when we talk about smoothness. The thing about gold nibs for me is that they're not as rigid as stainless steel nibs. I think gold nibs give a more enjoyable writing experience, but I don't dare use one in my checkbook because of needing to press to make the copy. That job is for my steel nibs. -- ~~Bluesea~~ Spam is great in musubi, but not in email. Please take out the trash before sending a direct reply. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Needed: Ink Recommendations for Sheaffer Nonsense Fountain Pen!
"MatthewK" wrote in message ... On 2008-06-09, Bluesea wrote: "MatthewK" wrote in message ... A 329 writes when you want it to whereas a new $400 dollar pen does not. Please be careful about generalizing. Do you really mean that there aren't ANY $400 pens that write when you want? Do you have the knowledge and experience to back up that statement? (The 329 was used as an example because hero was mentioned. A 329 from one of the good dealers writes better out of the box than most anything else IMO.) It doesn't matter that you're using a Hero for your example. My squawk is about "a new $400 dollar pen does not." That's misleadingly unequivocal. Of course not. Do you have the knowledge or experience to argue against it? My informal survey of penmiesters seems to suggest this to be true. While I don't own any Heroes or any pens that cost over $400, which two points alone might disqualify me, I do have over 100 fps, maybe over 150 by now. Combine my personal experience with what I've learned from various places over the years as well as from here. I think others cvan back this up: If you want a good write then don't pay over $40 bucks for a modern pen. I won't because that's much too low. Some of my favorite pens, Namiki Falcon, Namiki Vanishing Point, Parker Sonnet, Pilot Ecrino, & Sailor 1911M, retail for $60 - $170. My first Cross ATX cost $42. If I followed your rule, I would have missed out especially since the Falcon, which retails at $170 and cost me over $100, is still my #1 favorite over all the rest. I can't speak for the others but an hour spent googling the vp will give you a couple of results. How great the pen is. Why doesn't it work well with this ink, why doesn't it work well with this converter, why is it so noisy? I definitely fall in the "how great the pen is" category. Is that all you got after an hour of googling? I don't know what exactly was going on, of course, but off the top, those "why" complaints sound like they came from complete noobs, whiners, or idiots. IMO, newbies are to be helped and tolerated because everyone was a newbie when they first started and it's only right to return the favor of being helped when you were a newbie by helping someone else learn the ropes. Whiners are to be slapped upside the head, but since we're online and physically incapable of doing so, ignored. Idiots, like trolls, may be played with but are best ignored. Noisy?! For this one I want to say, "WTF?" Could the user not tolerate the clicking sound of the push-button or the scritch-scritch of writing? Whatever. Ink - different pens often write differently with different inks. Converter...shrug. AFAIK, there are two converters and they both worked fine for me. I switched to refilling cartridges simply because carts hold more ink and let me see the amount of ink remaining. The cheapest I've seen a new vp is $88-$160. I expect a pen that costly to work without a hitch but the rest of the market is satisfied with poor engineering and materials. There you go generalizing, again. "I expect...but the rest of the market is..." Gee, thanks a lot for pointing out that I and everyone else who enjoys a VP must surely be "satisfied with poor engineering and materials." FWIW, no matter how much a VP costs, the nib units are easily interchangeable and may be had for only about $25, depending on where it's bought. All one has to do is unscrew the barrel and slide out the nib unit. It's the same piece where the cartridge/converter is inserted. Isn't the economical advantage of having three nib widths and buying only one expensive pen, a plus? I usually use a fine nib unit, but occasionally switch to the medium. Both worked great from the start without a hitch. I think pilot is the wrong brand to discuss, because to a certain extent their pens seem to all be very similar in terms of hardware regardless of price. How many nib/feed assemblies do the manufacture? Anyone know? Considering that Namiki and Pilot are the same company and that Cross uses Namiki nibs (and Pelikan), and they make steel nibs and plated nibs and gold nibs, the answer is "lots." Namiki/Pilot may be the wrong brand to discuss because they and other Japanese pen companies have superior quality. Same goes for other companies such as Pelikan and... um...Waterman... and...um... As a rule of thumb I think $40 bucks or less is what newbies should here. I didn't mean to apply that to all situations. Thank you for qualifying your original statement. I agree that a newbie is likely wiser to start with a less expensive pen simply because of having to get used to the fp experience. If it doesn't work out and the user goes back to bps or rbs, s/he isn't out as much money. To me, it is simple marketing. Marketing? Bwahahaha! While that may be true of Montblanc... Just restricting ourselves to japanese makers what is more likely to write flawlessly out of the box, a namiki vp or a platinum preppy? In my experience, both are great pens. Neither performed better "out of the box" than the other. What would write better out of the box, a pelikano or something in the $400 dollar range? Although I don't have any $400 pens, from my experience with Pelikans at various price points, I'd say either. I have a Pelikano, a Future, an Epoch 360, and an M400 and they all worked great from the get-go. Now, if you want to compare a Pelikano with a $400 pen from a company that doesn't have the golden reputation that Pelikan has... That is not to be taken literally but it seems once you get to the $100 dollar mark, bad things start happening. Yes, please don't take that literally because literally none of my several $100 pens ever gave me a poor experience. Zero. Zip. Zilch. They were love affairs right out of the box as soon as they were inked and write better than the $100 pens. However, I believe that's because their gold nibs give a better experience overall than do steel nibs rather than it being an issue of not writing on demand. Gold nibs being better? That is surely personal bias. Please carefully reread what I wrote. I think your lucky to have had no problems. There really aren't many production pens that don't need adjusting out of the box. Oh, really? How do you know this to be a fact? Is it possible that you know about the complaints and not the satisfied customers merely because people are more vocal when they're unhappy and tend to silently go on with their lives when they're satisfied? As I posted above, I have over 100 fps, maybe over 150. While I don't have any that cost over $400, I've definitely gone well over your $40 ceiling. They all worked great from the start*. Indeed, it wasn't until I came to this group that I learned that some people have problems with new pens. Is it because I shop carefully? I like to think so. Am I lucky? Yes, definitely (long story & OT). * My latest pens are Kaweco Sports that cost $15 to $20. These are the first with which I've had any problems whatsoever and after I washed the nib sections in a solution of dishwashing liquid and water, they, too, were great. No adjustments needed. While I agree that user pens perform better than pens meant to be collectibles, your price range is much too narrow. I say that excellent writers can be had for $3 - $300; pens such as the larger Pelikans or the Omas 360, which some may need for comfort, being the exceptions. There should be others that I don't know about. Compare all the $100+ plus pens to what they were 40 years ago and I think my point rings true. No, because you were comparing modern pens only, under $40 and over $100. To bring in older pens at this point is a digression and I'm not following you there. For better or worse, Frank is one of my pen heros. His old postings as well as others led me to believe my statements are correct. Good for you. FWIW, I was here during his final years and while he was undoubtedly right about many things pertaining to pens and ink, he didn't know it all when it came to modern pens. For you to mount a soapbox without having his background or the experience that many of the longer-habitués of acpp have is a precarious stand to assume. OTOH, by sticking to what you know from personal experience, I'm confident that it'll be impossible for someone to dislodge a soapbox out from under you. -- ~~Bluesea~~ Spam is great in musubi, but not in email. Please take out the trash before sending a direct reply. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Needed: Ink Recommendations for Sheaffer Nonsense Fountain Pen!
"MatthewK" wrote in message ... On 2008-06-09, Bluesea wrote: Thanks for helping me clarify my thoughts. You're welcome. Discussion helps me, too. Your last statement about great pens from $3- $300(?) dollars is a good generalization. Isn't the thought of shelling out $300 for a single pen alarming? It chokes me. Yet, I have to be realistic - there are people who don't think twice about dropping that kind of dough on a good user pen. Wait 'til you're out of school and can afford a pen that costs over $40 . I've been thinking that I should raise the high end to $400 because of inflation. -- ~~Bluesea~~ Spam is great in musubi, but not in email. Please take out the trash before sending a direct reply. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Needed: Ink Recommendations for Sheaffer Nonsense Fountain Pen!
In ,
MatthewK wrote: On 2008-06-09, Brian Ketterling wrote: In , 8-O With all due respect, Matthew, I hope no one has hired you as a statistician. Hmmm...what are you talking about? That opinion was purely opinion. The only time I mentioned statistics was in quality control terms. Sorry, you're right. I was thinking in general of someone who forms an empirical picture of reality. I don't think I was wrong about "due respect" (so far all I've really seen is a decent person), but your *post* seemed like a foggy mess of anecdotes picked according to bias, suppositions to support those biases, and so on. Being you chose to quote the part about my respect for Frank I think something else is at play. I was just bracketing a long post with its beginning and end. Brian -- |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Needed: Ink Recommendations for Sheaffer Nonsense Fountain Pen!
On 2008-06-11, Brian Ketterling wrote:
In , MatthewK wrote: On 2008-06-09, Brian Ketterling wrote: In , 8-O With all due respect, Matthew, I hope no one has hired you as a statistician. Hmmm...what are you talking about? That opinion was purely opinion. The only time I mentioned statistics was in quality control terms. Sorry, you're right. I was thinking in general of someone who forms an empirical picture of reality. I don't think I was wrong about "due respect" (so far all I've really seen is a decent person), but your *post* seemed like a foggy mess of anecdotes picked according to bias, suppositions to support those biases, and so on. Thanks, and I think your right about me presenting most of my opinions as "foggy". I've started summer session classes...anatomy and chemistry. I've not been getting enough rest so just about everything I say/write is cloudy. Even so, I really ought to proof read my posts a few times for the sake of accuracy. Atleast that way, when disagreements arise there can .....the funny thing about all this is I've been making an attempt to study the trivium lately. lol Anything "bad" that has happened to me in any thread I post here is because of lack of clarity on my part. matthew p.s. I'll post reply/response to everyones replies later this week. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Needed: Ink Recommendations for Sheaffer Nonsense Fountain Pen!
Inspiring Discovery wrote:
My personal taste takes me to pens generally in the $200+ range (although I haven't bought a modern pen in a while, I prefer vintage) - I like the size of a large pen, and a large gold nib. I prefer piston filling systems. I've had one pen not work for me, and I've had to adjust the flow of ink to my liking in a few. But I'm not with you on the notion that a $40 pen writes better than a $400 pen just.... because it does. Mine definitely runs in the $200-500 (street price) range. Typical pens in my preferred price range that I own one or more of: Stipula Etruria Stipula Ventidue Stipula Novecento Visconti Van Gogh Visconti Opera Club Pelikan M600 series In the "Pens under $200" category, there's really only a few I'm satisfied enough with to buy more of: Stipula Vedo Aurora Ipsilon Namiki Vanishing Point Pilot Custom 98 -- _Deirdre web: http://deirdre.net blog: http://dsmoen.livejournal.com/ "Memes are a hoax! Pass it on!" |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Needed: Ink Recommendations for Sheaffer Nonsense Fountain Pen!
"Bluesea" wrote in message ... snipped Isn't the thought of shelling out $300 for a single pen alarming? It chokes me. Yet, I have to be realistic - there are people who don't think twice about dropping that kind of dough on a good user pen. Wait 'til you're out of school and can afford a pen that costs over $40 . I've been thinking that I should raise the high end to $400 because of inflation. $300 for a writing utensil is alarming. $300 for a fetish object is OK. If I'm away from my desk taking notes I use a mechanical pencil. If I'm at my desk I can play with my fountain pens. Giant inkspots in my books show where a newly purchased old pen finally showed it's real defect. Hours are spent soaking and rinsing so pens can be rotated. Enough ink for my grandchildren to waste is stored in the closet, colors I don't use nor like along with several quarts black, Pelican, Aurora and Noodlers which I have found to be the blackest of the blacks. This for writing? I doubt it. I have fine nib Waterman 12 eyedropper, nearly as reliable as a pencil (until the ink level gets really low and the heat from my hand expands the air in the barrel enough to make the pen drip) why then do I need the other 35, oh and that doesn't count the desk pens, the Safaris, the esterbrook inkwell and pen combos, the esterbrook fountain pens, the dozens of esterbrook nibs, the few accumulating in my desk to send out for repair, and the 7 pens I haven't gotten back from Richard yet. Lately though the urge hit me and I started cruising ebay again. I always figure a pens going to need $40 in repairs, put my handbook on my lap, scan for Waterman, Conklin, Mabie Todd, old Parkers, plant my bids and forget them. But I need to accumulate more 100 year old junk to send out to be repaired so I can rarely or never use it. And I don't consider myself a collector. I'd call it a fetish. JP |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Needed: Ink Recommendations for Sheaffer Nonsense Fountain Pen!
In news:6GQ4k.4276$Mu.3856@trndny07,
JP wrote: $300 for a writing utensil is alarming. $300 for a fetish object is OK. Lately though the urge hit me and I started cruising ebay again... I need to accumulate more 100 year old junk to send out to be repaired so I can rarely or never use it. And I don't consider myself a collector. I'd call it a fetish. Sounds more like a compulsion to /buy/ pens than an obsession with pens themselves. If they don't hold your interest for long, then maybe all the cleaning and rotating is your conscience telling you that you should do something with them ( -- and at this point I'll add the inevitable "send them to ME!"). Brian -- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA: Sheaffer White Dot Fountain Pen | nordenfeldt | Pens & Pencils | 0 | February 23rd 08 07:12 PM |
Sheaffer Fountain pens | wolfy | Pens & Pencils | 2 | December 23rd 07 05:09 PM |
Large reservoir fountain pen recommendations? | [email protected] | Pens & Pencils | 29 | April 8th 07 06:40 PM |
Inexpensive fountain pen recommendations | [email protected] | Pens & Pencils | 27 | June 13th 05 05:07 PM |
Plain fountain pen recommendations? | Dave | Pens & Pencils | 6 | September 24th 04 09:53 PM |