Bicycle revealed

Robert Morien wrote in message
...
Rod Speed wrote
Robert Morien wrote
Rod Speed wrote
DeserTBoB wrote
trippingtoo8track wrote

saying you are going to travel hundreds of miles to take
a photograph of someone's house, against their will snip

ALL PERFECTLY LEGAL

Maybe, depends on the circumstances.

So give us one single cite where it would be illegal (in the US)

Stalking laws.

So you can provide a cite where traveling hundreds
of miles to take a picture of someones house is stalking

Irrelevant to that particular question about whether
the illegality depends on the circumstances.

Corse there are. Quite a bit of legislation is a threat,
what happens to you if you choose to breach it.

Figures that someone as retarded as
you would no pig-**** about legislation

Even a terminal ****wit such as yourself should be able to bull****
your way out of your predicament better than that pathetic effort.

Obviously not.

Rod Speed wrote:
Robert Morien wrote in message
...

Rod Speed wrote

Robert Morien wrote

Rod Speed wrote

DeserTBoB wrote

trippingtoo8track wrote


saying you are going to travel hundreds of miles to take
a photograph of someone's house, against their will snip


ALL PERFECTLY LEGAL


Maybe, depends on the circumstances.


So give us one single cite where it would be illegal (in the US)


Stalking laws.


So you can provide a cite where traveling hundreds
of miles to take a picture of someones house is stalking


Irrelevant to that particular question about whether
the illegality depends on the circumstances.


Corse there are. Quite a bit of legislation is a threat,
what happens to you if you choose to breach it.


Figures that someone as retarded as
you would no pig-**** about legislation


Even a terminal ****wit such as yourself should be able to bull****
your way out of your predicament better than that pathetic effort.

Obviously not.


Must be near the end of the welfare cycle. When does the next check
come?

--
To reply via e-mail please delete 1 c from paccbell

In article ,
"Rod Speed" wrote:

Robert Morien wrote in message
...
Rod Speed wrote
Robert Morien wrote
Rod Speed wrote
DeserTBoB wrote
trippingtoo8track wrote

saying you are going to travel hundreds of miles to take
a photograph of someone's house, against their will snip

ALL PERFECTLY LEGAL

Maybe, depends on the circumstances.

So give us one single cite where it would be illegal (in the US)

Stalking laws.

So you can provide a cite where traveling hundreds
of miles to take a picture of someones house is stalking

Irrelevant to that particular question about whether
the illegality depends on the circumstances.


It would have been much simpler to just admit that you can't provide a
cite demonstrating at least one case where it would be illegal.

Not surprised that a senile illiterate like you would find it easier to
demonstrate your impotence in an effort to hide your lack of knowledge.

Corse there are. Quite a bit of legislation is a threat,
what happens to you if you choose to breach it.

Figures that someone as retarded as
you would no pig-**** about legislation

Even a terminal ****wit such as yourself should be able to bull****
your way out of your predicament better than that pathetic effort.

It's never worked for you yet

In article ,
"Rod Speed" wrote:

Robert Morien wrote in message
...
Rod Speed wrote

and yes, IS A THREAT.

Corse it is, but not necessarily an illegal one.

It's not even a THREAT, when you consider that Charlie
Nudo is most likely an untreated paranoid schizophrenic.

Wrong again. The law doesnt allow threatening those even if he is one.

Cite one US law that makes it illegal to threaten a paranoid schizophrenic

Cite one US law that proscribes threatening behaviour
that exempts paranoid schizophrenic targets.

even a senile ****** like you should be able to do better than this
puerile attempt at covering up your inadequacy.

Face it speed****, you got called and you couldn't step up to the plate.

But I did enjoy your facile ability to once again prove how impotent you
are.

In article ,
George Grapman wrote:

Must be near the end of the welfare cycle. When does the next check
come?

Told you it was too easy to yank his chain. We say jump, he asks how
high.

Robert Morien wrote:
In article ,
"Rod Speed" wrote:


Robert Morien wrote in message
...

Rod Speed wrote

Robert Morien wrote

Rod Speed wrote

DeserTBoB wrote

trippingtoo8track wrote

saying you are going to travel hundreds of miles to take
a photograph of someone's house, against their will snip

ALL PERFECTLY LEGAL

Maybe, depends on the circumstances.

So give us one single cite where it would be illegal (in the US)

Stalking laws.

So you can provide a cite where traveling hundreds
of miles to take a picture of someones house is stalking

Irrelevant to that particular question about whether
the illegality depends on the circumstances.



It would have been much simpler to just admit that you can't provide a
cite demonstrating at least one case where it would be illegal.

Not surprised that a senile illiterate like you would find it easier to
demonstrate your impotence in an effort to hide your lack of knowledge.


Corse there are. Quite a bit of legislation is a threat,
what happens to you if you choose to breach it.

Figures that someone as retarded as
you would no pig-**** about legislation

Even a terminal ****wit such as yourself should be able to bull****
your way out of your predicament better than that pathetic effort.


It's never worked for you yet


Bowel boy/work = oxymoron.
Notice how a simple request about his inability to admit error set
him off?

Robert Morien wrote:
In article ,
"Rod Speed" wrote:


Robert Morien wrote in message
...

Rod Speed wrote

and yes, IS A THREAT.

Corse it is, but not necessarily an illegal one.

It's not even a THREAT, when you consider that Charlie
Nudo is most likely an untreated paranoid schizophrenic.

Wrong again. The law doesnt allow threatening those even if he is one.

Cite one US law that makes it illegal to threaten a paranoid schizophrenic

Cite one US law that proscribes threatening behaviour
that exempts paranoid schizophrenic targets.


even a senile ****** like you should be able to do better than this
puerile attempt at covering up your inadequacy.

Face it speed****, you got called and you couldn't step up to the plate.

But I did enjoy your facile ability to once again prove how impotent you
are.

Happens all the time. Remember the recent seat belt thread? A while
ago he claimed that the First Amendment did not cover non-citizens. When
the text of a Supreme Court decision that said otherwise was posted
bowel boy refuted it by saying "bull****"
Today he made specious claims about collective bargaining. When shown
to be wrong he completely flipped out with a rant that exceeded even his
usual low standards.
Look at his response to William who simply asked why he can to never
accept ever being wrong.

Robert Morien wrote:
In article ,
George Grapman wrote:


Must be near the end of the welfare cycle. When does the next check
come?


Told you it was too easy to yank his chain. We say jump, he asks how
high.

Yep, the check comes on Monday.

On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:12:36 GMT, Rod Slow .
wrote:


Today he made specious claims about collective bargaining. When shown
to be wrong he completely flipped out with a rant that exceeded even his
usual low standards. snip

Wish I could've been there. I know collective bargaining inside out.
Love to catch this moron in another goof on that subject!

Anyone who spells like he does cannot be too bright. He must be a
friend of Charlie Nudo!

Some gutless ****wit that cant even manage its own lines,
or anything else at all, either desperately cowering behind
Robert Morien wrote in message
...
just the puerile **** thats always pouring from the back of it.