If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
More on the Long s
In the recent thread on literary scandals, my friend, Jon Meyers,
provided an old thread of mine from May 2001 as a reference on the Long s: http://tinyurl.com/lxs7z My research efforts pale, however, when compared to the research efforts of Paul W. Nash, one of the biggies in the biblio world. In response to a May 1999 thread on the Letterpress Discussion List, Paul Nash wrote: "...The question of why the long s was dropped around 1800 in London is a fascinating one, which I have been working on for some time. At the risk of being accused of self-advertisement, I am hoping to publish my conclusions fairly soon, probably in the Printing Historical Society Journal..." Mr Nash's entire response to the Letterpress thread is provided he http://tinyurl.com/oy6sf Paul Nash's conclusions were published in the Summer 2001 issue of the "Journal of the Printing Historical Society (NS.3 2001, 3-19)," His article, "The abandoning of the long s in Britain in 1800," is a masterpiece. It supports one of my own conclusions from my RCB thread, and corrects another one. In my May 2001 RCB thread, I reported that John Bell was the first publisher to discard the long s. Paul Nash proved me wrong; however, I wasn't the only one who thought that. As Paul Nash reveals in his article, Leigh Hunt mentioned that very fact about John Bell in 1860 in the second edition of his autobiography. I can't believe I missed this reference to Hunt in my initial RCB thread! I collect Leigh Hunt, and even read his autobiography, although, too many years ago, evidently. Paul Nash cites the 1749 edition of Ames' "Typographical Antiquities" as probably the earliest work in Britain to abandon the long s. He follows that with a work published by Robert and Andrew Foulis in 1758 and cites over ten other works by various publishers which were published without the long s between 1760 and 1780. Although John Bell, in 1784, wasn't the first publisher to abandon the long s, he was responsible for showing that its elimination was popular with the reading public and advantageous to the printing industry. Nevertheless, it wasn't until 1800 that the majority of the publishers began to abandon the long s. I arrived at my own conclusion that 1800 was the magic date by sampling some of the works in my own library which were published before and after 1800. Paul Nash used the same method to form his conclusion, except his samplings came from the British Library, the Royal Institute of British Architects's Library and the Bodleian Library. Paul Nash went one step further and sought the reason why the year, 1800, was the year when many printers abandoned the long s. Mr. Nash credits a law which was passed on July 12, 1799, for creating the opportunity for change in the printing industry: the Seditious Societies Act. Because of unrest in Ireland, France and in England, the British government passed this act, seeking to control the printing industry, and to prevent the publication of revolutionary pamphlets and books. One of the requirements of the Seditious Societies Act was that printers were required to print their names and places of business on the first and last leaves of their published works so that they would be readily identifiable to government inspectors. Prior to this date, many printers simply identified themselves by their initials. In effect, this new requirement became an advertisement for the printers. Eliminating the long s in their printed works showed the public that the printers were "of modern times" and not of the antiquated times where the use of the hard-to-read long s flourished. I have only touched upon some of the finer points of Paul Nash's article. The entire article is, in essence, "the bible" on the abandoning of the long s . If published as an offprint, I believe it would be a best seller in the book collecting world. Jerry Morris, Man of Other People's Letters, Soon to be Retired. Moi's Books About Books: http://www.tinyurl.com/hib7 Moi's LIbrary http://www.moislibrary.com My Sentimental Library http://www.picturetrail.com/mylibrary Florida Bibliophile Society http://www.floridabibliophilesociety.org |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA: WWII U.S. Army Wool Long Sleeve Undershirt | fishnet | General | 0 | October 24th 05 01:28 AM |
$6 Million Saints Exhibit & David Tripp at Long Beach Expo | Halfsense | Coins | 0 | August 26th 04 02:30 PM |
TOMORROW night - Long Island pen club meeting | Nancy Handy | Pens & Pencils | 0 | July 21st 04 07:59 PM |
PR: Walton 1913 nickel at Long Beach Expo | Nospamdonn | Coins | 1 | August 28th 03 06:50 PM |
My Baltimore experience...really long. | Chrysta Wilson | Coins | 55 | August 14th 03 06:34 AM |