If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
bookseller?
"Francis A. Miniter" writes:
If you read the responses, I think you will see that most of us have concluded that the person was not listing books for sale but checking out what he could get selling them retail if he were to buy them and list them. Most of us, perhaps, but not all of us. There is a definite advantage to not having to risk any capital or to have to maintain any kind of storage facility. Also, the mere fact that a book is listed online at a certain price doesn't mean that anyone is buying it at that price or any price. The online listings would be useful information if they were prices that people said they were willing to pay. It is not unusual to see books being listed for thousands of dollars at Amazon, just because some bookseller is waiting for someone who is both rich enough and desperate enough to pay it. It doesn't mean that someone can actually sell that book at any price. Someone suggested that the books move too quickly for such a scheme to work. I'm not sure that is true. What I'm wondering now is how many booksellers might be listing the very same books, all sitting on the library sale shelf. -- Ignorantly, Allan Adler * Disclaimer: I am a guest and *not* a member of the MIT CSAIL. My actions and * comments do not reflect in any way on MIT. Also, I am nowhere near Boston. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
bookseller?
"Allan Adler" wrote in message ... "Francis A. Miniter" writes: If you read the responses, I think you will see that most of us have concluded that the person was not listing books for sale but checking out what he could get selling them retail if he were to buy them and list them. Most of us, perhaps, but not all of us. There is a definite advantage to not having to risk any capital or to have to maintain any kind of storage facility. Also, the mere fact that a book is listed online at a certain price doesn't mean that anyone is buying it at that price or any price. The online listings would be useful information if they were prices that people said they were willing to pay. It is not unusual to see books being listed for thousands of dollars at Amazon, just because some bookseller is waiting for someone who is both rich enough and desperate enough to pay it. It doesn't mean that someone can actually sell that book at any price. Someone suggested that the books move too quickly for such a scheme to work. I'm not sure that is true. What I'm wondering now is how many booksellers might be listing the very same books, all sitting on the library sale shelf. -- Ignorantly, Allan Adler Into conspiracy theories, eh? An intelligent bookseller (or picker) would have base his picks on whether the market was already flooded, if there were known needs for the books *at a certain price point*, etc. But most of the automated systems I'm acquainted with, are just databases tied to an ISBN. I can't imagine anyone listing books he hasn't bought yet. Kris Skeptic |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
bookseller?
"Kris Baker" writes:
Allan Adler wrote: What I'm wondering now is how many booksellers might be listing the very same books, all sitting on the library sale shelf. Into conspiracy theories, eh? Actually, no. First of all, by wondering how many booksellers might be listing the very same book, one doesn't rule out the possibility that the number is zero, which is your position. Second, even if one assumes the number is greater than one, it is entirely possible that the booksellers in question are not acting in concert but that, instead, they coincidentally happen, in some cases, to have listed the same book. Coincidences do happen and the recognition of that fact is diametrically opposed to the main premises of most consipiracy theories (leaving aside the outright lies). An intelligent bookseller (or picker) would have base his picks on whether the market was already flooded, if there were known needs for the books *at a certain price point*, etc. But most of the automated systems I'm acquainted with, are just databases tied to an ISBN. I can't imagine anyone listing books he hasn't bought yet. You might be right. I'm keeping an open mind about it. But, since you seem to know how these systems actually work, which is an interesting topic in its own right, maybe you can say a little more about them. For starters, what are the automated systems you're acquainted with? -- Ignorantly, Allan Adler * Disclaimer: I am a guest and *not* a member of the MIT CSAIL. My actions and * comments do not reflect in any way on MIT. Also, I am nowhere near Boston. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
bookseller?
On 15 Sep 2007 23:02:20 -0400, Allan Adler
wrote: First of all, by wondering how many booksellers might be listing the very same book, one doesn't rule out the possibility that the number is zero, which is your position. Second, even if one assumes the number is greater than one, it is entirely possible that the booksellers in question are not acting in concert but that, instead, they coincidentally happen, in some cases, to have listed the same book. Coincidences do happen and the recognition of that fact is diametrically opposed to the main premises of most consipiracy theories (leaving aside the outright lies). I think you need to go lie down for awhile. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
bookseller?
On Sep 15, 7:48 am, "Francis A. Miniter"
wrote: Bill wrote: On Sep 12, 7:01 am, Allan Adler wrote: Recently, I was at a library and noticed someone sitting by some books being sold by the library. This person was using a laptop to connect via wifi to Amazon. Apparently he/she was looking up the sale books at Amazon, but I couldn't see in greater detail what was being done. My guess is that he/she is listed at Amazon as a bookseller and was listing the library sale books as being available from him/her, setting the price at a level that would be competitive with the ones already listed. Since the library typically sells the books for no more than $2 each, that could be quite profitable if the book is ever sold by that bookseller. Furthermore, the bookseller doesn't have to warehouse the books: the library does it for him/her. Even the wifi hotspot is provided by the library. True, an individual book might be sold by the library before it can be ordered online, but these things happen and, if the book is subsequently ordered, a bookseller can simply report that the book is no longer available. That might reflect badly on the bookseller, from Amazon's point of view. But a conscientious bookseller engaged in this particular enterprise might regularly visit the library book sale books and update the inventory to see which ones are still available, making the scenario less likely in which a book is ordered and found not to be available. In fact, that might be what this individual was really doing: updating the inventory and cancelling his/her listings of books that were no longer available. I have to admit, that does sound pretty enterprising. And one does often find good books on sale at libraries. I can't go to every library to see what it has to offer and, in effect, this bookseller is offering the service of doing it for me. Actually, the person sounds rather petty and stupid. In the first place, the cheap nitwit is listing books that he does not have in his possession. If you read the responses, I think you will see that most of us have concluded that the person was not listing books for sale but checking out what he could get selling them retail if he were to buy them and list them. Francis A. Miniter- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You may be right, but I was using the "let's assume the poster is correct -- then what?" approach. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
bookseller?
On Sep 15, 6:28 pm, Allan Adler wrote:
"Francis A. Miniter" writes: If you read the responses, I think you will see that most of us have concluded that the person was not listing books for sale but checking out what he could get selling them retail if he were to buy them and list them. Most of us, perhaps, but not all of us. There is a definite advantage to not having to risk any capital or to have to maintain any kind of storage facility. Exactly how much "capital" would we be talking about here? If the library in question is anything like the library near where I live, the "capital" would rarely be more than $10, because most of their stuff has an Amazon Low Price of a couple of dollars, and therefore would not be worth the bother. Also, the mere fact that a book is listed online at a certain price doesn't mean that anyone is buying it at that price or any price. The online listings would be useful information if they were prices that people said they were willing to pay. It is not unusual to see books being listed for thousands of dollars at Amazon, just because some bookseller is waiting for someone who is both rich enough and desperate enough to pay it. It doesn't mean that someone can actually sell that book at any price. I would maintain that approach I suggested to valuing books is one worth considering. You throw out the fantasy prices, those which are ridiculously high. You also throw out the suspiciously low prices. Then you average the prices left. For example, let's say a dealer is asking $500 for a book that four reputable dealers are asking $30, $35, $40, and $50 dollars for. I would value that book at $38.75, or, we might as well say, about $40. If there was a suspicious listing of the same book in the same condition for $3, I would throw that price along with the fantasy price. That approach is far from infalliable, but is certainly more accurate than looking up the price in somebody's printed book. I certainly agree that listings for many books on Amazon include fantasy prices. Maybe there are a lot of rubes on the net with money to burn these days. Maybe they feel they can get more "culture" from a book with a wildly inflated price tag... Someone suggested that the books move too quickly for such a scheme to work. I'm not sure that is true. It was a valid point. What sort of "entrepreneur" is going to risk a flock of Amazon lack of fulfillment ratings just because his "capital" is not sufficient to allow him to shell out $10 or $20 dollars for a number of books worth many times that amount, judging by the Amazon Low Price? What I'm wondering now is how many booksellers might be listing the very same books, all sitting on the library sale shelf. Again, just for fun assuming your suspicions are correct, the ones doing that are likely the "booksellers" who peddle to the donation store on a bicyle with big wire baskets on the rear wheel, who wear glasses with lenses looking like the bottoms of Coca Cola bottles, who wear heavy overcoats on a hot day, and conduct business from a cockroach-infested attic they reside in over a garage. More seriously, I personally think your suspicions are baseless, because the library donation stores in my area have -- on a typical day -- such a large percentage of books with an Amazon Low Price equal to or below the trifle the library is asking for them. As for the few that would be worth listing, any bookseller I know would much rather shell out a few dollars for them than risk bad customer ratings due to listing books he does not actually have. You scenario suggests a dim bulb of a book dealer saying to himself, "Gee, someone just ordered this book I listed on Amazon for $18. I had better rush over to the library donation store and buy it for $2, then." Seems like a trivial way to do business, but then, since there seem to be so many "Shipping Charge Scrounges" listing books for a penny, so they can scrape out a dirty nickel, so to speak, in the difference between what Amazon reimburses them and what they actually pay for postage and packing materials, I suppose anything is possible. Sigh... [Memo from the upstairs office.] -- Ignorantly, Allan Adler * Disclaimer: I am a guest and *not* a member of the MIT CSAIL. My actions and * comments do not reflect in any way on MIT. Also, I am nowhere near Boston. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
bookseller?
Bill writes:
Allan Adler writes: There is a definite advantage to not having to risk any capital or to have to maintain any kind of storage facility. Exactly how much "capital" would we be talking about here? If the library in question is anything like the library near where I live, the "capital" would rarely be more than $10, because most of their stuff has an Amazon Low Price of a couple of dollars,and therefore would not be worth the bother. Well, if the entire "inventory" of the bookseller consists of just the books that I happened to see at that local library on that day, then I would agree that it would be better to invest the capital. But if there are a lot of local libraries, as is the case in some places, and if the bookseller uses the sale books at all of them, then the required investment would be much more significant, as would the implied storage requirements. Some local libraries have entire basement rooms with dozens of shelves full of sale books. One branch alone can have as many sale books as a small bookstore. I would maintain that approach I suggested to valuing books is one worth considering. You throw out the fantasy prices [...] You also throw out the suspiciously low prices. Then you average the prices left. That's a reasonable strategy. I would only point out, regarding the ridiculously low prices, that they are not necessarily to be disregarded. I have bought perfectly good books for well under a dollar. I don't know why they are so cheap. There might be profits from savings on mailing, but it's also possible that the booksellers with such low prices are trying to build up their approval ratings as they start up their business and just need to attract sales at any price, as long as they at least break even. I certainly agree that listings for many books on Amazon include fantasy prices. Maybe there are a lot of rubes on the net with money to burn these days. Maybe they feel they can get more "culture" from a book with a wildly inflated price tag... For example, Laplace's Celestial Mechanics was published by Chelsea before they went out of business. It is a 4 volume translation from French of his great classic and the used price on Amazon was something like $2000 when I looked it up some time ago. I think there are people who would consider it worth it who are not rubes or culture wonks. Some libraries might conceivably go that high since it is such an important classic and is otherwise unavailable. It was a valid point. What sort of "entrepreneur" is going to risk a flock of Amazon lack of fulfillment ratings just because his "capital" is not sufficient to allow him to shell out $10 or $20 dollars for a number of books worth many times that amount, judging by the Amazon Low Price? I agree that a bookseller has an interest in avoiding bad ratings. However, there is a statistical rate at which the books tend to disappear and a statistical rate at which they tend to be ordered. I expect that both are low. If the bookseller checks his/her "inventories" much more frequently than that, the likelihood of having an unavailable book ordered would also be low. Even airlines over-"book", based on their statistical likelihood of having too many passengers show up for a given flight. Again, just for fun assuming your suspicions are correct, Can we use the more neutral term "speculations"? the ones doing that are likely the "booksellers" who [speculation about life style and appearance of hypothetical bookseller deleted] Assuming there are some booksellers operating as I have described, it is quite possible that they are not very successful. It is also possible that they are making enough money to make it worth their while. One would really have to study the number of books available, their prices, the rates at which they get sold by branch libraries, they rates at which they tend to be ordered on Amazon, the savings on storage, the necessary number of visits to the library to update the data and do the math before drawing any reliable conclusions about the relevant stochastic processes. We haven't done that, so it is better to keep an open mind about it. Next time I see this person, I'll ask them about it. He/she was perfectly normally dressed, didn't smell bad and probably would have given me a civil and articulate answer. -- Ignorantly, Allan Adler * Disclaimer: I am a guest and *not* a member of the MIT CSAIL. My actions and * comments do not reflect in any way on MIT. Also, I am nowhere near Boston. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
bookseller?
"R. Totale" wrote in message ... On 15 Sep 2007 23:02:20 -0400, Allan Adler wrote: First of all, by wondering how many booksellers might be listing the very same book, one doesn't rule out the possibility that the number is zero, which is your position. Second, even if one assumes the number is greater than one, it is entirely possible that the booksellers in question are not acting in concert but that, instead, they coincidentally happen, in some cases, to have listed the same book. Coincidences do happen and the recognition of that fact is diametrically opposed to the main premises of most consipiracy theories (leaving aside the outright lies). I think you need to go lie down for awhile. I think we all do. Meanwhile, the OP can go do his own research. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
bookseller?
Allan Adler wrote:
"Francis A. Miniter" writes: If you read the responses, I think you will see that most of us have concluded that the person was not listing books for sale but checking out what he could get selling them retail if he were to buy them and list them. Most of us, perhaps, but not all of us. There is a definite advantage to not having to risk any capital or to have to maintain any kind of storage facility. Leaving books you're listing at the public library sale is going to be about as successful as putting them on the sidewalk in front of your house WRT being able to go get them again after you've made a sale. Also, the mere fact that a book is listed online at a certain price doesn't mean that anyone is buying it at that price or any price. Certainly. The online listings would be useful information if they were prices that people said they were willing to pay. It is not unusual to see books being listed for thousands of dollars at Amazon, just because some bookseller is waiting for someone who is both rich enough and desperate enough to pay it. It doesn't mean that someone can actually sell that book at any price. That's true, over the course of time for certain books; but for some books that will work. Someone suggested that the books move too quickly for such a scheme to work. I'm not sure that is true. You're welcome to run any field tests you care to make. Do let us know what the results are. What I'm wondering now is how many booksellers might be listing the very same books, all sitting on the library sale shelf. Probably almost none, since their fulfillment rate will quickly fall below the thresholds of the big online services. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
bookseller?
Allan Adler wrote:
[snip] I agree that a bookseller has an interest in avoiding bad ratings. However, there is a statistical rate at which the books tend to disappear and a statistical rate at which they tend to be ordered. I expect that both are low. If the bookseller checks his/her "inventories" much more frequently than that, the likelihood of having an unavailable book ordered would also be low. Even airlines over-"book", based on their statistical likelihood of having too many passengers show up for a given flight. While there are theoretical models in which such a strategy could work, most of them are so unlikely to follow real-world trends as to make playing the lottery a better choice. You'd have to have a library with a hefty collection of valuable books that keep being put out for sale at low rates, where almost no one except this bookseller comes and buys them, and the book sale is one that allows the bookseller access within the time frame required by the listing services for shipping, which I believe is either 2 days or 3 days for Amazon. Valuable books tend to disappear from library sales much faster than they are ordered online, but the returns from the eventual sale nearly always makes it worthwhile to snap it up right away for the astute seller. It's just too darn risky to do otherwise. [snip] Assuming there are some booksellers operating as I have described, it is quite possible that they are not very successful. It is also possible that they are making enough money to make it worth their while. The latter case probably happens about as often as winged monkeys make their exit from one's nether regions. Having assisted a bookseller who was hunting for inventory at library sales in the face of other booksellers doing the same thing, I know that such a possibility is not worth considering for someone who's planning on eating based on the results. One would really have to study the number of books available, their prices, the rates at which they get sold by branch libraries, they rates at which they tend to be ordered on Amazon, the savings on storage, the necessary number of visits to the library to update the data and do the math before drawing any reliable conclusions about the relevant stochastic processes. We haven't done that, so it is better to keep an open mind about it. Or one could go to a library sale after finding out who are the local booksellers and seeing what is left over after they've picked the place clean. Next time I see this person, I'll ask them about it. He/she was perfectly normally dressed, didn't smell bad and probably would have given me a civil and articulate answer. And probably was doing what Frances and I have said. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
All praise to R. Dunaway, Bookseller... | Jonathan | Books | 5 | July 20th 06 05:19 PM |
SF/F/H Bookseller Peder D. Wagtskjold RIP | [email protected] | Books | 0 | June 8th 05 06:35 PM |
Bookseller v. German Govt. | Jon Meyers | Books | 1 | January 23rd 05 07:14 PM |
Bookseller Terminology | Tom L-M | Books | 5 | May 24th 04 05:28 PM |