final designs for Arizona

http://www.azcentral.com/ent/quarter...ters_main.html
--
Those who would give up ESSENTIAL LIBERTY to purchase a little TEMPORARY SAFETY, deserve
neither LIBERTY nor SAFETY.

Pennsylvania Assembly
November 11, 1755

George D wrote:
http://www.azcentral.com/ent/quarter...ters_main.html
--
Those who would give up ESSENTIAL LIBERTY to purchase a little TEMPORARY SAFETY, deserve
neither LIBERTY nor SAFETY.

Pennsylvania Assembly
November 11, 1755



My pick - #1

#2. I don't like the position of the wording "Grand Canyon State" it is
in approx. the middle of the design
and is a distraction.

#3. Is at least OK, I like the cactus but is that the Grand Canyon in
the background or a generic desert scene?

#4. Powell's expedition was important but it comes off as honoring
Powell more than Arizona.

#5. The Navajo code talkers - see above. Their actions were important
in WWII but what does that have to
do with Arizona other than the fact they were from there? It would be
more appropriate for a series of coins
honoring WWII actions.

stonej wrote:
George D wrote:
http://www.azcentral.com/ent/quarter...ters_main.html
--
Those who would give up ESSENTIAL LIBERTY to purchase a little
TEMPORARY SAFETY, deserve neither LIBERTY nor SAFETY.

Pennsylvania Assembly
November 11, 1755



My pick - #1

#2. I don't like the position of the wording "Grand Canyon State" it
is in approx. the middle of the design
and is a distraction.

#3. Is at least OK, I like the cactus but is that the Grand Canyon in
the background or a generic desert scene?

Generic desert scene.


#4. Powell's expedition was important but it comes off as honoring
Powell more than Arizona.

#5. The Navajo code talkers - see above. Their actions were
important in WWII but what does that have to
do with Arizona other than the fact they were from there? It would be
more appropriate for a series of coins
honoring WWII actions.


Looks like #2 is leading the pack with #1 a close second.

--
©¿©¬
~
Ed Hendricks

I like either 1, 2, or 3 and wouldn't be disappointed with any of the three.
If I were rating them in order of preference, it would be 2, 3 and then 1.
4 and 5 don't do anything for me.


"George D" wrote in message
news
http://www.azcentral.com/ent/quarter...ters_main.html
--
Those who would give up ESSENTIAL LIBERTY to purchase a little TEMPORARY
SAFETY, deserve
neither LIBERTY nor SAFETY.

Pennsylvania Assembly
November 11, 1755

I also like 1, 2, and 3. I voted for #2

I like #1 and #3

"George D" wrote in message
news
http://www.azcentral.com/ent/quarter...ters_main.html
--
Those who would give up ESSENTIAL LIBERTY to purchase a little TEMPORARY
SAFETY, deserve neither LIBERTY nor SAFETY.

Pennsylvania Assembly
November 11, 1755

Ed Hendricks wrote:
stonej wrote:
George D wrote:
http://www.azcentral.com/ent/quarter...ters_main.html
--
Those who would give up ESSENTIAL LIBERTY to purchase a little
TEMPORARY SAFETY, deserve neither LIBERTY nor SAFETY.

Pennsylvania Assembly
November 11, 1755


My pick - #1

#2. I don't like the position of the wording "Grand Canyon State" it
is in approx. the middle of the design
and is a distraction.

#3. Is at least OK, I like the cactus but is that the Grand Canyon in
the background or a generic desert scene?

Generic desert scene.

#4. Powell's expedition was important but it comes off as honoring
Powell more than Arizona.

#5. The Navajo code talkers - see above. Their actions were
important in WWII but what does that have to
do with Arizona other than the fact they were from there? It would be
more appropriate for a series of coins
honoring WWII actions.


Looks like #2 is leading the pack with #1 a close second.


Now it looks like #5 is ahead-- someone must be 'spamming' the vote.

#1 is not going to look good on a coin. I think #2 and #3 are best;
preferably #3, it's less cluttered.