If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Washed Books ?
wrote:
The wormed copy does have a library stamp located exactly at the cut-out section of the washed copy. If you suspect that both copies may have originated from that same library (and that library still exists), it might be worth checking that they were properly deaccessioned from that library. About freshness, the washed copy overall looks much nicer than the wormed copy. Then I would go for that. John |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Washed Books ?
"John R. Yamamoto-Wilson" wrote:
wrote: What is the difference between removing library stamp and proof of ownership ? Alice is saying that maybe the the book had been stolen from the library and the library stamp was removed to hide that fact. If part of the title page has been cut out, I don't see how you can know what may once have been on that section (unless it was printed text). Are you just guessing that it may have been a library stamp? If so, it's a reasonable guess, but surely it is just as likely to have been a signature by a previous owner? But perhaps you have more to go on and can identify the actual library (perhaps because there are other stamps elsewhere in the book)? If so, then it might be worth contacting the library to see whether the book has indeed been properly deaccessioned. Gee, should we be doing that with all our books? What about books bought at a library sale? The library itself may not have concretely established ownership, so this gets difficult. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Washed Books ?
"Walter Traprock" wrote in message ... "John R. Yamamoto-Wilson" wrote: wrote: What is the difference between removing library stamp and proof of ownership ? Alice is saying that maybe the the book had been stolen from the library and the library stamp was removed to hide that fact. If part of the title page has been cut out, I don't see how you can know what may once have been on that section (unless it was printed text). Are you just guessing that it may have been a library stamp? If so, it's a reasonable guess, but surely it is just as likely to have been a signature by a previous owner? But perhaps you have more to go on and can identify the actual library (perhaps because there are other stamps elsewhere in the book)? If so, then it might be worth contacting the library to see whether the book has indeed been properly deaccessioned. Gee, should we be doing that with all our books? What about books bought at a library sale? The library itself may not have concretely established ownership, so this gets difficult. Many, if not most, books bought at library sales were donated to the library and never entered into the collection at all. When books that have been part of a collection are deaccessioned, they are generally stamped "Withdrawn" in some prominent place, like the title page, or the top or bottom page edges. Admittedly, someone could easily fake such a stamp, but I wouldn't suggest that every collector running across a book stamped "Withdrawn" follow up. On the other hand, the book in question appears to be of some value, and the original poster did say that a piece of the title page was cut out to remove a library stamp (although he may have been guessing as to what was removed). Since missing material is generally considered worse than defaced material, it's unlikely that any knowledgeable person would actually remove a piece of a page unless they wanted to conceal former ownership. In fact, former ownership for a book of this age would generally be considered a valuable piece of provenance. So, one has to ask oneself...why the removal? The first thing that springs to my mind is that the book was stolen from a library collection, and the information was removed so that the true owner could not be identified. There might be other reasons, but that's the first thing I thought of. If that were the case, it might even be possible to identify the library, since there are probably a limited number that list the book in their holdings. I don't collect them myself, but it seems to me that 400 year old books can't be that thick on the ground. One could conceivable write to libraries based on their WorldCat entries. But that's not advice for every book that comes one's way. It's only that this one has been defaced in an odd way that sends up a red flag for me, at least. Alice |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Washed Books ?
"my-wings" wrote in message ... " wrote in message ups.com... By the way, the cut-out in the title page is to remove the library stamp. Calvin That sounds odd. Are you sure the book was properly deaccessioned? Maybe that cutout was to remove proof of ownership. Alice Perhaps if Calvin simply told everyone how exactly he just came to "find" these two 400 year old books, then that might help make things a bit clearer. biblios -- |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Washed Books ?
"my-wings" wrote in message ... Since missing material is generally considered worse than defaced material, it's unlikely that any knowledgeable person would actually remove a piece of a page unless they wanted to conceal former ownership. In fact, former ownership for a book of this age would generally be considered a valuable piece of provenance. The several times I've run across a somewhat collectible book with part or all of the title page missing my assumption was that some numbskull had removed the author's "autograph." I doubt that's the case here, I'm just saying. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Washed Books ?
The book was rebound in 1800s. While there are 2 initials on the book spine, there are no stamp or other marks in the book. Since the cutout raised a red flag, as Alice mentioned, I decided not to proceed further. Thanks all for your comments. Calvin On Jun 17, 5:23 am, "foad" wrote: "my-wings" wrote in message ... Since missing material is generally considered worse than defaced material, it's unlikely that any knowledgeable person would actually remove a piece of a page unless they wanted to conceal former ownership. In fact, former ownership for a book of this age would generally be considered a valuable piece of provenance. The several times I've run across a somewhat collectible book with part or all of the title page missing my assumption was that some numbskull had removed the author's "autograph." I doubt that's the case here, I'm just saying. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Washed Books ?
wrote:
The book was rebound in 1800s. While there are 2 initials on the book spine, there are no stamp or other marks in the book. Since the cutout raised a red flag, as Alice mentioned, I decided not to proceed further. I think that may be unduly cautious. If the cutting-out is old, as you say, it may well have been done at the time of rebinding simply because the owner resented having whatever was written/stamped there on his book. You have to bear in mind that, in the 19th century, while it would have been recognised as a collectible book, it probably had no very great value attached to it, so the incentive to steal it would have been much smaller, and the qualms about defacing it much fewer. There is no record of the book having been stolen on the ABAA database (http://www.abaa.org/books/abaa/datab...n_search.html). That doesn't prove anything, of course, but it probably means it hasn't been stolen any time in the recent past. One way you might get to the bottom of this is by taking the matter to the Exlibris discussion list (http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/byfor...sts/exlibris/; scroll down to "Subscribing" and follow the instructions given there). There are many trained librarians on that list, who will be able to give you authoritative guidance on this. Someone may even be able to confirm whether this book has ever been reported stolen. John |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Washed Books ?
On Jun 17, 10:33 am, "John R. Yamamoto-Wilson"
wrote: wrote: The book was rebound in 1800s. While there are 2 initials on the book spine, there are no stamp or other marks in the book. Since the cutout raised a red flag, as Alice mentioned, I decided not to proceed further. I think that may be unduly cautious. If the cutting-out is old, as you say, it may well have been done at the time of rebinding simply because the owner resented having whatever was written/stamped there on his book. You have to bear in mind that, in the 19th century, while it would have been recognised as a collectible book, it probably had no very great value attached to it, so the incentive to steal it would have been much smaller, and the qualms about defacing it much fewer. There is no record of the book having been stolen on the ABAA database (http://www.abaa.org/books/abaa/datab...n_search.html). That doesn't prove anything, of course, but it probably means it hasn't been stolen any time in the recent past. One way you might get to the bottom of this is by taking the matter to the Exlibris discussion list (http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/byfor...libris/;scroll down to "Subscribing" and follow the instructions given there). There are many trained librarians on that list, who will be able to give you authoritative guidance on this. Someone may even be able to confirm whether this book has ever been reported stolen. John Thanks for the info, John. Calvin |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA/FS-! Ebay Large collection of depression glass -Green cherry blossom, Pennsbury Pottery, Player Piano Rolls, tins, Brand new crochetted bed skirt - queen size - vintage books & kids books as well as hundreds of other books action figures, toy | queenoftheinternetauctions | General | 0 | October 26th 05 02:27 PM |
Spanish treasure rumored to have washed up in Florida | JSTONE9352 | Coins | 1 | October 1st 04 02:03 AM |
FA:ebay this week - Country Chic - Gnome planter -china, pottery, glass, porcelain, jewelry, vintage lace, action figures BOOKS BOOKS BOOKS | Beth | General | 0 | March 7th 04 01:35 PM |
old books, rare books, valuable books and bargain price books | Studio Bibliografico Iavarone | Books | 0 | November 25th 03 01:11 PM |
Washed - Note.Boy don't bid! | Scottishmoney | Paper Money | 4 | August 27th 03 11:27 PM |