If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
What is a cameo finish?
"Michael" wrote in message oups.com... So essentially all proofs are cameos? A proof fits the description. Or is it some rare phenomenon that happens to proof coins. AlexBivin described the cameo effect pretty well here, along with what causes it. All proofs are not cameos. Most pre-1980 US proof coins are not. All coins in recent US proof sets have been produced to intentionally incorporate the cameo feature, except for (IIRC) the proof silver and gold bullion coins. As has also been mentioned, some older BU circulation strikes can have a cameo appearance, and these are highly sought after by some collectors due to their scarcity. Morgan silver dollars come to mind here. If you'll check out some major auction catalogs, you'll often see a few choice coins from the 1800's that display a cameo effect. Bruce |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
What is a cameo finish?
Aren't Matte Proofs used all the time here? The UNC versions of all
Commems are essentially Matte Proofs. The UNC version of the 1986 Liberty Half Dollar was a true mint quality specimen. But the UNC versions of the recent Franklin Dollars are no doubt matte proofs. Mike Marotta wrote: Michael wrote: Having never really collected certified coins, I would like to know what is meant by the term cameo when used in the grading of both proof and mint state coins? Just to add a point: what has been said is correct for MODERN coins. Also, as noted many Morgan Dollars have cameo and deep cameo features. The Mint was forced to strike millions of these useless coins and they went through hundreds of dies. New dies under adequate pressure created the "cameo" appearance of a proof-like coin, though, of course, the coins were NOT proofs. Proofs -- by definition -- are created from multiple strikes with polished dies on specially prepared planchets. Proofs probably go back no farther than the late 1600s as rarities. As we would recognize them, they are identifiable from records of the early 1800s and forward. The "matte proof" finish of the early 20th century, invented in France, and briefly popular here, never has a cameo effect, by its very nature. (If you go to the ANA website, www.money.org, and click on the dropdown for Communications, you can select Numismatist, the monthly magazine. In the 2005 Archives, the May issue has a cover story that I wrote about Proof Double Eagles.) Mike M. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
What is a cameo finish?
Michael wrote:
Aren't Matte Proofs used all the time here? The UNC versions of all Commems are essentially Matte Proofs. No. By definition, a proof coin must be (MUST be) 1. struck multiple times. 2. from specially prepared dies 3. on specially prepared planchets. It is true that there are cases where proof dies were dragooned into business strike usage. However, it is generally true that the diagnostics for a proof coin have little to do with the frostiness, etc., and everything to do with the DIE diagnostics. Proof coins are struck from proof dies. Proof dies are (generally; most often; with exceptions) NOT the same dies as the ones used for business strikes. (Did you read the article I wrote on Proof Gold?) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
What is a cameo finish?
"Michael" wrote in message ups.com... Having never really collected certified coins, I would like to know what is meant by the term cameo when used in the grading of both proof and mint state coins? Here is just a proof cameo-- http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/7...bvsmalltd8.jpg Here is a proof deep cameo-- http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/4...bvsmallsb0.jpg Here is a proof really super deep cameo. You want to find one like this-- http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/546...bvsmallug5.jpg Here is a business strike 'MS' cameo--or at least a very close to a full cameo. The torch is a little lacking. http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/3...vmediumqh1.jpg Here is a satin finish coin with a cameo-- http://img239.imageshack.us/img239/6...evsmallkt3.jpg HTH |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
What is a cameo finish?
"bri" wrote in message ink.net... "Michael" wrote in message ups.com... Having never really collected certified coins, I would like to know what is meant by the term cameo when used in the grading of both proof and mint state coins? Here is just a proof cameo-- http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/7...bvsmalltd8.jpg Here is a proof deep cameo-- http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/4...bvsmallsb0.jpg Here is a proof really super deep cameo. You want to find one like this-- http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/546...bvsmallug5.jpg Here is a business strike 'MS' cameo--or at least a very close to a full cameo. The torch is a little lacking. http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/3...vmediumqh1.jpg Here is a satin finish coin with a cameo-- http://img239.imageshack.us/img239/6...evsmallkt3.jpg HTH Forgot to add that both sides need to match in order for most grading companies of respect to dish out the deep cameo designation--IOW you can't get that if one side is just a cameo and the other is a deep cameo. And one company might be less brutal at giving out the designation than another--you just have to look at the coin instead of what the holder says and make your own judgment. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
What is a cameo finish?
The three requirments below would apply to the unc versions of modern
commems. I am under the impression that they prepare the dies the same then sand blast them with fine granuals to give them the matte finish. So technically it costs more to make the UNC versions that the proofs. The UNC Marines dollars is no doubt a matte proof. Now another possibility would be for the dies not to be prepared as well but say 90% as good then the flaws are covered by the sandblasting. Mike Marotta wrote: Michael wrote: Aren't Matte Proofs used all the time here? The UNC versions of all Commems are essentially Matte Proofs. No. By definition, a proof coin must be (MUST be) 1. struck multiple times. 2. from specially prepared dies 3. on specially prepared planchets. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
What is a cameo finish?
Michael wrote:
The three requirments below would apply to the unc versions of modern commems. Would they? Do they receive multiple strikes? Are they struck from specially prepared polished planchets like proofs? I am under the impression that they prepare the dies the same then sand blast them with fine granuals to give them the matte finish. So technically it costs more to make the UNC versions that the proofs. How so? Proof dies are also sandblasted to achieve the cameo finish. The fields are highly polished, the dies chromium plated to extend die life and each die is used to strike a limited number of coins before being retired or refinished. Do you have any proof that all of the above (and more) is done with the unc dies. If not, how can they "technically" cost more than proof dies? The UNC Marines dollars is no doubt a matte proof. Well, that 's up for debate. The argument started in 1998 when the Mint came out with the Kennedy Collectors Set which contained an unc RFK commemorative dollar and a Matte Silver Kennedy Half Dollar. Packaged side by side it was obvious to most that both coins had the same finish and some dealers began hyping the unc RFK commem as being a matte proof. Of course, the finish on that silver dollar was no different than any other modern commemorative silver dollar. You can call it anything you want (and possibly be wrong)....but the Mint simply refers to them as "uncirculated".....not matte proof. Now another possibility would be for the dies not to be prepared as well but say 90% as good then the flaws are covered by the sandblasting. Mike Marotta wrote: Michael wrote: Aren't Matte Proofs used all the time here? The UNC versions of all Commems are essentially Matte Proofs. No. By definition, a proof coin must be (MUST be) 1. struck multiple times. 2. from specially prepared dies 3. on specially prepared planchets. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
What is a cameo finish?
"John Carney" wrote in message
news:ihuCg.21682$qw5.17797@trnddc06... "AlexBivin" wrote in message ups.com... Phil DeMayo wrote: AlexBivin wrote: As Bruce has already mentioned, the CAM of DCAM/UCAM designations are usually found on proof coins. The only exception to this rule that I have thus far found, is in SMS coinage from 1965-67...... You are forgetting early Morgan dollars which can exhibit quite heavy cameo finishes. Ah yes, how could I forget! I am sure there are others I have overlooked as well. The Morgans in question are labeled as DMPL (deep mirror proof like), just for those new to collecting and not familiar with cameo contrast. Here is a question, as stated before, DCAM, CAM and DMPL aren't grades per say, so they can be applied to any coin that exhibits that particular propery (in theory). So has anyone ever seen other coins (other than Morgans) designated DMPL? I've seen several Columbian Commemorative Half dollars designated PL and possessing a light cameo contrast. John Visit the RCCers favorite coins web page http://mysite.verizon.net/jcarney44/coins/rccers.html I have two quarter eagles with a bit of a cameo contrast. One is in an MS61 (or 62?) PL holder and the other is in a straight MS64 holder, but is quite distinctly better than any other MS64 quarter eagle I have seen. I have salivated over a few cameo proof seated halves. I'm going to get myself one someday... someday.... I think in the late 1800's, the US Mint folks took more pride in the art of producing nice coins than at any other time. The Morgan dollar dies, if I recall correctly, were soaked in acid (pickling solution) to produce a frosted effect, and then polished to make the fields shine. This could have been done to other dies. I just wish there were peace dollars where the same level of effort had been expended in producing a beautiful coin. IF |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
What is a cameo finish?
"Phil DeMayo" wrote in message
ups.com... Michael wrote: The three requirments below would apply to the unc versions of modern commems. Would they? Do they receive multiple strikes? Yes. Are they struck from specially prepared polished planchets like proofs? Specially prepared is a fuzzy term. Not working at the mint, I can't be certain about how much polishing the planchets receive, however, examining the coins would indicate that to the extent that planchet scratches matter in the final coins, modern commemorative planchets are more finely cared for than 1950's proof planchets were. Modern proof planchets are likely more highly polished. I am under the impression that they prepare the dies the same then sand blast them with fine granuals to give them the matte finish. So technically it costs more to make the UNC versions that the proofs. How so? Proof dies are also sandblasted to achieve the cameo finish. The fields are highly polished, the dies chromium plated to extend die life and each die is used to strike a limited number of coins before being retired or refinished. Uncirculated commemorative (and silver eagle) dies are blasted with fine particles. It was my understanding that modern proof dies are laser etched. Do you have any proof that all of the above (and more) is done with the unc dies. If not, how can they "technically" cost more than proof dies? Anything more than a speculative answer on this one is impossible unless you are the mint's accountant. FWIW, I believe the chrome plating would put the modern proof dies over the top. The UNC Marines dollars is no doubt a matte proof. Well, that 's up for debate. The argument started in 1998 when the Mint came out with the Kennedy Collectors Set which contained an unc RFK commemorative dollar and a Matte Silver Kennedy Half Dollar. Packaged side by side it was obvious to most that both coins had the same finish and some dealers began hyping the unc RFK commem as being a matte proof. Of course, the finish on that silver dollar was no different than any other modern commemorative silver dollar. You can call it anything you want (and possibly be wrong)....but the Mint simply refers to them as "uncirculated".....not matte proof. That's probably a reasonable answer. Still, the finish on a modern commemorative is quite different than that on a coin meant for circulation, and to collectors who care about the difference some distinctive nomenclature is probably worthwhile. For my part, I want to acquire a matte proof eagle. If / when my collecting budget permits me to, I'll compare it to a modern commemorative and give my thoughts on the finishes. You, being a dealer, may already be able to give a first hand comparison. I would be interested in hearing you compare and contrast the coins. A matte proof buffalo nickel would also be good for comparison, since it's composition is the same as the outer layers of a modern commemorative half. IF |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
What is a cameo finish?
lagos Fool wrote in part:
You, being a dealer........ I'm not a dealer. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1993 "Finish Line Racing" 150-Card Set | J.R. Sinclair | General | 0 | December 14th 04 06:23 AM |
FS: 1994 "Finish Line Racing" 150-Card Set | J.R. Sinclair | General | 0 | June 8th 04 06:08 AM |
E-bay - Regency Saphiret Drop Necklace Set, Etruscan Cinnabar Set, Victorian Engraved Bands, Large Scenic Cameo, Hardstone Cameo Locket, Darling Silver & Jade Peapod Necklace, Victorian Opal Ring, More! | Megan McGee's | General | 0 | March 17th 04 01:10 PM |
Large Scenic Cameo w/Cherub, Angelskin Coral, Deco Chrysophase Bracelet, Czech Lapis Glass Necklace, Best Hardstone Cameo Pearl Locket, More! | Megan McGee's | General | 0 | February 29th 04 10:32 PM |
1999D Nickel With Frosty Finish Question? | MIckey | Coins | 4 | July 23rd 03 05:37 PM |