If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
question about 1883 shield Nickel
PUZZLED
The 1883 Shield Nickel (NO CENTS) has a productiuon of 5M+ and is priced at $14.00 in AU...the 1883 Shield Nickel (WITH CENTS) in AU with a production of 16M+ is priced at $69.00..can anyone explain the logic...the 1894 Shield with the same production of 5M+ is at $200.00 In AU.. thats the closest I could find in production numbers that equal the 1883 Shield (NO CENTS). Don't production numbers have any effect on that year of a coin ? 5M is a rather low number and being that 16M of the other type were made you would think that the lesser made be worth a few dollars more.... M=Million Thanks |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Mike Sr. spoke
thusly... PUZZLED The 1883 Shield Nickel (NO CENTS) has a productiuon of 5M+ and is priced at $14.00 in AU...the 1883 Shield Nickel (WITH CENTS) in AU with a production of 16M+ is priced at $69.00..can anyone explain the logic...the 1894 Shield with the same production of 5M+ is at $200.00 In AU.. thats the closest I could find in production numbers that equal the 1883 Shield (NO CENTS). Don't production numbers have any effect on that year of a coin ? 5M is a rather low number and being that 16M of the other type were made you would think that the lesser made be worth a few dollars more.... It is all about survivability. The No Cents was apparently saved/hoarded in greater quantities than the With Cents so even though it has a lower mintage, more have survived. My guess is that it was saved because it was replaced early on and people would have figured it would be 'rare' because it was replaced. When enough people do that, it ain't gonna be rare. :-) The With Cents was probably ignored (after all, it was the replacement not the replacee) and therefor is the one that ended up rare. Prices are based upon supply and demand not original mintage. Demand is probably similar for both coins as each is needed for both a type set and a date set. So, the supply of each one is apparently different. Similar things are at work when there is a big difference in price between small jumps in grade. A coin in VG or F might be common and worth next to nothing but in the VF and EF range it skyrockets (I think some Barber coins do this) because very few examples were saved early on until they were well worn down. (Oh and they are Liberty Nickels, not Shields) -- Stu Miller Coins in the News - Coin Newspaper (Updated Daily): http://www.TheStujoeCollection.com/news.htm |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Sr." wrote in message ... PUZZLED The 1883 Shield Nickel (NO CENTS) has a productiuon of 5M+ and is priced at $14.00 in AU...the 1883 Shield Nickel (WITH CENTS) in AU with a production of 16M+ is priced at $69.00..can anyone explain the logic...the 1894 Shield with the same production of 5M+ is at $200.00 In AU.. thats the closest I could find in production numbers that equal the 1883 Shield (NO CENTS). Don't production numbers have any effect on that year of a coin ? 5M is a rather low number and being that 16M of the other type were made you would think that the lesser made be worth a few dollars more.... M=Million Thanks I think you mean Liberty Nickel, it was the one released in 1883, and replaced the Shield nickel. The first variety as you note did not have the Cents on the reverse, when it was released it was often gold plated by nefarious individuals and passed off as a $5 gold piece. For this reason the US Mint added Cents to the reverse. As a result the public hoarded the earlier version of the coin as a curiousity and that is why to this day it is much more common in better grades than the higher mintage figure with cents variety. Dave |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Stujoe
spoke thusly... Prices are based upon supply and demand not original mintage. Demand is probably similar for both coins as each is needed for both a type set and a date set. Scratch the 'Date Set' part and replace with 'Complete Set'. :-) -- Stu Miller Coins in the News - Coin Newspaper (Updated Daily): http://www.TheStujoeCollection.com/news.htm |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Sr." wrote:
PUZZLED The 1883 Shield Nickel (NO CENTS) has a productiuon of 5M+ and is priced at $14.00 in AU...the 1883 Shield Nickel (WITH CENTS) in AU with a production of 16M+ is priced at $69.00..can anyone explain the logic...the 1894 Shield with the same production of 5M+ is at $200.00 In AU.. thats the closest I could find in production numbers that equal the 1883 Shield (NO CENTS). Don't production numbers have any effect on that year of a coin ? 5M is a rather low number and being that 16M of the other type were made you would think that the lesser made be worth a few dollars more.... Because it's more about the *survivors* than the size of the spawning pool. ;-) First year of issue, and with a design change that made it collectible? High rates of hoarding create more near-mint state survivors. The 'With Cents' variety went to work and was not hoarded, leaving fewer near-mint state survivors. Alan 'it's how many survive' |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PR: NGC Confirms Authentication of Recovered 1913 Liberty Nickel | ANA | Coins | 0 | September 11th 03 07:18 PM |
PR: Walton 1913 nickel at Long Beach Expo | Nospamdonn | Coins | 1 | August 28th 03 06:50 PM |
Shield Nickel Question | Larry Louks | Coins | 1 | August 23rd 03 08:00 PM |
1999D Nickel With Frosty Finish Question? | MIckey | Coins | 4 | July 23rd 03 05:37 PM |
Spam Question: Or A Former (one-time only) Spammer Explains Himself | Mark | Books | 1 | July 17th 03 08:40 AM |