If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The U.S. Cent, A Perspective, Part I
The United States monetary system can affect the whole world: The US Cent has been in use for over 200 years, and has been under attack by a congressman, the question should be, has all aspects of the cent and it's usage been examined fully. First, it is pertinent to have an idea of the total commerce and trade supported by the U.S. Monetary System, with a way to easily visualize a comparison to other economies using other monetary systems. The following web page is a useful graphic representation for this; http://www.studentsoftheworld.info/i...rank/PNB2.html There are reasons why some Americans are uncomfortable or embarrassed when a chart like this is presented, but it should be realized that the United States produces more than it consumes in certain critical consumables such as food. The chart makes it clear that the economy of the US is not just a little bigger, and this means that a lot more money is needed to sustain this economy. There should be some reluctance to change anything about an economy or monetary system that supports it. Taking away any part of the monetary system is a risk that no thinking individual should contemplate, adding should be done with study and forethought. The US Cent has little effect on import and export trade, ant the two biggest importers of US product are Canada and Mexico, with Japan and China following. But any change in the U.S. Monetary System can have an effect on rates of exchange and the general impression of the US Dollar. While much has been said about the massive minting of US Cents, there is less than one cent per person per week minted, and less than 40 per year if only the money spending public is counted. To put this in perspective, the average American may drink an average of one or two soft drinks per day, so the cost of soft drinks for one day is more than the entire production of the US Cent. This writer consumes about 10 or 12 cans of diet soft drinks per day, and feels guilty about this, and also buys about 80 cents worth of miniature Reese Cups per day. The sales tax on these two items is many times the amount of US cents minted on a per person per year basis. This would seem to illustrate just how trivial the total production and costs of minting cents _is_. And with at least 1500 cents per person already minted, all it would take to force the mint to stop minting cents is for any national TV personality or politician to make a sincere and passionate appeal for everyone to turn in all the cents they do not want to keep, and the FRB would be forced to stop requesting cents from the mint. Hey, Jay Leno, are you listening? Joe Fischer |
Ads |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The U.S. Cent, A Perspective, Part I
"Joe Fischer" wrote in message ... The United States monetary system can affect the whole world: The US Cent has been in use for over 200 years, and has been under attack by a congressman, the question should be, has all aspects of the cent and it's usage been examined fully. First, it is pertinent to have an idea of the total commerce and trade supported by the U.S. Monetary System, with a way to easily visualize a comparison to other economies using other monetary systems. The following web page is a useful graphic representation for this; http://www.studentsoftheworld.info/i...rank/PNB2.html There are reasons why some Americans are uncomfortable or embarrassed when a chart like this is presented, but it should be realized that the United States produces more than it consumes in certain critical consumables such as food. The chart makes it clear that the economy of the US is not just a little bigger, and this means that a lot more money is needed to sustain this economy. There should be some reluctance to change anything about an economy or monetary system that supports it. Taking away any part of the monetary system is a risk that no thinking individual should contemplate, adding should be done with study and forethought. The US Cent has little effect on import and export trade, ant the two biggest importers of US product are Canada and Mexico, with Japan and China following. But any change in the U.S. Monetary System can have an effect on rates of exchange and the general impression of the US Dollar. While much has been said about the massive minting of US Cents, there is less than one cent per person per week minted, and less than 40 per year if only the money spending public is counted. To put this in perspective, the average American may drink an average of one or two soft drinks per day, so the cost of soft drinks for one day is more than the entire production of the US Cent. This writer consumes about 10 or 12 cans of diet soft drinks per day, and feels guilty about this, and also buys about 80 cents worth of miniature Reese Cups per day. The sales tax on these two items is many times the amount of US cents minted on a per person per year basis. This would seem to illustrate just how trivial the total production and costs of minting cents _is_. And with at least 1500 cents per person already minted, all it would take to force the mint to stop minting cents is for any national TV personality or politician to make a sincere and passionate appeal for everyone to turn in all the cents they do not want to keep, and the FRB would be forced to stop requesting cents from the mint. Hey, Jay Leno, are you listening? Joe Fischer What's the point here, Joe? The "perspective" examples leave me clueless, too, and I'm not all that old yet. If total production and costs of minting cents is indeed trivial, this information looks like it could be used to support both those who advocate stopping cent production as well as those who favor the status quo. The fact remains that most people seem to tolerate the penny on the incoming end, but consider it virtually useless on the outgoing end. Most likely would not raise an eyebrow if we stopped making them. As for me, I doubt the penny supports our economy, literally or figuratively. We need a lot more money to sustain our economy? So we should avoid changing anything in our monetary system? I don't get the connection here. If the natural demise of our half dollar has done nothing to weaken our monetary system at home or worldwide, I doubt that intentional elimination of our lowly cent would cause the sky to fall either. Only those few with a dog in the fight seem to really care about this, one way or another. Bruce |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The U.S. Cent, A Perspective, Part I
On Wed, "Dik T. Winter" wrote:
In article writes: The following web page is a useful graphic representation for this; http://www.studentsoftheworld.info/i...rank/PNB2.html From this I take it that the amount of banknotes produced in the USA is about 10 times the yearly GNP of the USA. I would think that is inflational. No, please notice that many charts are in thousands or millions or Billions. The US GNP is 15 Trillion, the amount of currency in circulation is now about 750 Billion, and 2/3rds of the cash is overseas. GNP = Cash times 12. Joe Fischer |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The U.S. Cent, A Perspective, Part I
Joe Fischer wrote:
The United States monetary system can affect the whole world: The US Cent has been in use for over 200 years, and has been under attack by a congressman, the question should be, has all aspects of the cent and it's usage been examined fully. First, it is pertinent to have an idea of the total commerce and trade supported by the U.S. Monetary System, with a way to easily visualize a comparison to other economies using other monetary systems. The following web page is a useful graphic representation for this; http://www.studentsoftheworld.info/i...rank/PNB2.html There are reasons why some Americans are uncomfortable or embarrassed when a chart like this is presented, but it should be realized that the United States produces more than it consumes in certain critical consumables such as food. The chart makes it clear that the economy of the US is not just a little bigger, and this means that a lot more money is needed to sustain this economy. There should be some reluctance to change anything about an economy or monetary system that supports it. Taking away any part of the monetary system is a risk that no thinking individual should contemplate, adding should be done with study and forethought. The US Cent has little effect on import and export trade, ant the two biggest importers of US product are Canada and Mexico, with Japan and China following. But any change in the U.S. Monetary System can have an effect on rates of exchange and the general impression of the US Dollar. While much has been said about the massive minting of US Cents, there is less than one cent per person per week minted, and less than 40 per year if only the money spending public is counted. To put this in perspective, the average American may drink an average of one or two soft drinks per day, so the cost of soft drinks for one day is more than the entire production of the US Cent. This writer consumes about 10 or 12 cans of diet soft drinks per day, and feels guilty about this, and also buys about 80 cents worth of miniature Reese Cups per day. And I thought I was the only one who drank that much soda. (Pepsi) I am of the opinion that eliminating the one cent coin could be a very small step to eliminate waste in government. As the old saying goes a Penny saved is a Penny earned. We need to start somewhere and this is as good a place as any. Of course the boat has to keep moving and not stop here. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The U.S. Cent, A Perspective, Part I
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 01:28:46 GMT, George D wrote:
And I thought I was the only one who drank that much soda. (Pepsi) It has become a habit for many, thankfully there are diet sodas and caffeine free sodas. I am of the opinion that eliminating the one cent coin could be a very small step to eliminate waste in government. As the old saying goes a Penny saved is a Penny earned. Maybe not, if the price of zinc falls as new mines are started up and production ramps up in existing mines in response to the higher prices/profits, the mint might begin to make a profit on the cent again, as it has done for many years. It is poor planning to only think of one year, and it isn't realistic to think prices will continue to rise, as there is no shortage, almost 194,000 tons are in warehouses. We need to start somewhere and this is as good a place as any. Of course the boat has to keep moving and not stop here. A better place would be to roll back the $30,000 per year the congress has raised their own pay since the last increase in the federal minimum wage. That $30,000 _raise_ is 3 times the earnings of a person working for minimum wages. The mint generates a profit of 700 million for the government, and the interest on the loans made by the FRB made possible by the printing of money has amounted to possibly more than 100 Billion, so both the mint and the printing of money more than pays for itself. People come to expect exact change just as banks and credit card companies expect exact amount in payment. With the exception of Japan, the US economy is 10 times the size of any other country (not counting the bartering and undocumented transactions), and in my opinion it is folly to make any changes in such an exceptional and dynamic system. One thing the mint could possibly do is go back to making the planchets instead of contracting so many things out. And just relax production of cents some, and that would make the price of zinc come down. I don't understand how anybody can claim that the metal in a cent is worth more than face when the price of zinc is about $1.50 a pound, and it takes more than 170 cents to make a pound. Joe Fischer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For trade, or eighty per cent off, part two | gawaintheknight | Hockey | 0 | May 16th 04 04:42 PM |
Eighty per cent off, or for trade, part one | gawaintheknight | Hockey | 0 | May 16th 04 04:42 PM |
My Chiller/Fangoria Experience - Part 2 | Michael | Autographs | 5 | January 22nd 04 09:21 PM |
What part of "80% off" don't you understand? part three | gawaintheknight | Hockey | 0 | October 22nd 03 03:05 PM |
What part of "80% off" don't you understand? part one | gawaintheknight | Hockey | 0 | October 22nd 03 03:04 PM |