A collecting forum. CollectingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » CollectingBanter forum » Collecting newsgroups » Coins
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

PCGS slabs 95 counterfeit Morgans and offers to make guarantee good



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 27th 05, 04:07 AM
Bill Krummel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default PCGS slabs 95 counterfeit Morgans and offers to make guarantee good

Article is dated April 25;

http://www.pcgs.com/articles/article...universeid=313

Bill


Ads
  #2  
Old April 27th 05, 04:32 AM
dmzcompute
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I wonder how many are in the other certification companies holders and
what they will do. NGC and ANACS maybe. ACG, NTC and PCI it will have
to be a cold day in hell for them to admit a mistake and make
restitution.

David

  #3  
Old April 27th 05, 02:28 PM
Anita
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:07:19 -0500, "Bill Krummel"
wrote:

Article is dated April 25;

http://www.pcgs.com/articles/article...universeid=313

Bill


Wow! Maybe these coins should be certified as a certain type -- maybe
a Bill Brown dollar :-) with Bill being the pseudonym of this
ingenious counterfeiter.

Wonder how many were made. And I wonder what other years may have been
affected that we don't know about yet.

Anita
  #4  
Old April 27th 05, 02:32 PM
Anita
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 26 Apr 2005 20:32:03 -0700, "dmzcompute"
wrote:

I wonder how many are in the other certification companies holders and
what they will do. NGC and ANACS maybe. ACG, NTC and PCI it will have
to be a cold day in hell for them to admit a mistake and make
restitution.

David


Maybe no restitution will be needed. The counterfeits may create more
interest now that they have been revealed. They may be worth more than
the legit O coins of the years.

Anita
  #5  
Old April 27th 05, 02:40 PM
Anita
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:07:19 -0500, "Bill Krummel"
wrote:

Article is dated April 25;

http://www.pcgs.com/articles/article...universeid=313

Bill


They are out there being sold still :-)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...0748 028&rd=1
Anita
  #6  
Old April 27th 05, 09:51 PM
Phil DeMayo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 13:40:31 GMT, Anita wrote:

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:07:19 -0500, "Bill Krummel"
wrote:

Article is dated April 25;

http://www.pcgs.com/articles/article...universeid=313

Bill


They are out there being sold still :-)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...0748 028&rd=1
Anita


The seller doesn't seem too concerned that the coin has been
identified as being counterfeit (scroll to the bottom of the listing).

Of course, if PCGS is correct, you can't legally own it, sell it or
give it away.

  #7  
Old April 27th 05, 10:15 PM
Anita
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:51:01 -0400, Phil DeMayo
wrote:
....
http://www.pcgs.com/articles/article...universeid=313

....

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...0748 028&rd=1

....

The seller doesn't seem too concerned that the coin has been
identified as being counterfeit (scroll to the bottom of the listing).

Of course, if PCGS is correct, you can't legally own it, sell it or
give it away.



Some of us sent links to the article to this seller and to another one
that was selling a very expensive one of another year --
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...sPageName=WDVW
I don't think that either plan to pull their auctions. Actually, I
wouldn't mind owning one. It would be interesting to start a
collection of bad coins -- counterfeits, whizzed, addee mint marks,
etc. I don't want to pay $3750 for a counterfeit, though. Maybe $37.50
would be okay :-)

Anita


  #8  
Old April 27th 05, 10:49 PM
Phil DeMayo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:15:52 GMT, Anita wrote:

Actually, I wouldn't mind owning one. It would be interesting to start a
collection of bad coins -- counterfeits, whizzed, addee mint marks,
etc. I don't want to pay $3750 for a counterfeit, though. Maybe $37.50
would be okay :-)

Anita


Before you undertake an endeavor such as this keep in mind that
counterfeit and altered coins are defined as contraband in US Code and
are subject to seizure

Additionally, the Department of Justice periodically issues a
directive to the Secret Service reminding them that they may seize any
vehicle used to transport counterfeit coins.

Food for thought.

  #9  
Old April 27th 05, 10:59 PM
Anita
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:49:36 -0400, Phil DeMayo
wrote:

Before you undertake an endeavor such as this keep in mind that
counterfeit and altered coins are defined as contraband in US Code and
are subject to seizure

Additionally, the Department of Justice periodically issues a
directive to the Secret Service reminding them that they may seize any
vehicle used to transport counterfeit coins.


Does this include mail trucks? :-)

My major concern would be that we don't live forever, so counterfeit
or altered coins would have to be marked to keep them from entering
future markets. The idea of marking a coin is very unappealing.

Anita
  #10  
Old April 27th 05, 11:14 PM
Phil DeMayo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:59:20 GMT, Anita wrote:

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:49:36 -0400, Phil DeMayo
wrote:

Before you undertake an endeavor such as this keep in mind that
counterfeit and altered coins are defined as contraband in US Code and
are subject to seizure

Additionally, the Department of Justice periodically issues a
directive to the Secret Service reminding them that they may seize any
vehicle used to transport counterfeit coins.


Does this include mail trucks? :-)

My major concern would be that we don't live forever, so counterfeit
or altered coins would have to be marked to keep them from entering
future markets. The idea of marking a coin is very unappealing.

Anita


One poster to this newsgroup would suggest that you only need to mark
the holder containing the coin. That is insufficient.

As I just told Bruce H. in the "Fake 1914-D" thread, the definition of
"imitation numismatic item" in the Hobby Protection Act includes
counterfeit coins. Thus, the word COPY, conforming to the Act's
marking requirements, stamped on one of the faces of the coin is the
way to go.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CollectingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.