If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
The electrum of the early Greek coinage was a naturally occurring alloy
of gold and silver at 3/4 gold to 1/4 silver. Later coins made of an artificially created gold/silver alloy were also described as being "electrum". Billy Reid Goldsborough wrote: On 24 May 2005 12:52:31 -0700, "Anka" wrote: When I first saw the coin advertised I thought it was electrum, but since it was offered for only $100... sigh *That* would be a deal. Early electrum in incredibly appealing. It's an odd metal, playing a controversial role in very early coinage. It appears that it resulted from gold being deliberately debased with silver, but was it done openly or surreptitiously? If you know, I'd appreciate it if you would tell me already. -- Email: (delete "remove this") Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 25 May 2005 13:24:24 GMT, "note.boy"
wrote: The electrum of the early Greek coinage was a naturally occurring alloy of gold and silver at 3/4 gold to 1/4 silver. This is not true. The electrum in the earliest Lydian and Greek coinage has a lower gold content than this, according to all of the metallurgical studies I've seen in the literature. And it wasn't standardized either, not at the percentage you say above or any other percentage. Where did you read this stuff? -- Email: (delete "remove this") Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Reid Goldsborough wrote: On Wed, 25 May 2005 13:24:24 GMT, "note.boy" wrote: The electrum of the early Greek coinage was a naturally occurring alloy of gold and silver at 3/4 gold to 1/4 silver. This is not true. The electrum in the earliest Lydian and Greek coinage has a lower gold content than this, according to all of the metallurgical studies I've seen in the literature. And it wasn't standardized either, not at the percentage you say above or any other percentage. Where did you read this stuff? -- Email: (delete "remove this") Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos It is true otherwise I wouldn't have posted it, every mention of "electrum" that I've seen in coin books describes it as a naturally occurring alloy of gold and silver. Four sources, The Coin Atlas ISBN 1-85605-468-3 Teach Yourself Guide To Numismatics, bought when I was about 15 years old. :-) Money, A History ISBN 0-312-21212-7 Ancient Greece, A Handbook. ISBN 0-7509-1973-6 Electrum was mined from the sands of some rivers in western Turkey. All of the above state that it's a naturally occurring alloy, three don't mention the proportions but one gives the content as 3/4 gold to 1/4 silver. Do you accept that it's a naturally occurring alloy as this is not clear from your post. Are you just discussing the metal mix? Billy |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"note.boy" wrote: Reid Goldsborough wrote: On Wed, 25 May 2005 13:24:24 GMT, "note.boy" wrote: The electrum of the early Greek coinage was a naturally occurring alloy of gold and silver at 3/4 gold to 1/4 silver. This is not true. The electrum in the earliest Lydian and Greek coinage has a lower gold content than this, according to all of the metallurgical studies I've seen in the literature. And it wasn't standardized either, not at the percentage you say above or any other percentage. Where did you read this stuff? -- Email: (delete "remove this") Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos It is true otherwise I wouldn't have posted it, every mention of "electrum" that I've seen in coin books describes it as a naturally occurring alloy of gold and silver. Four sources, The Coin Atlas ISBN 1-85605-468-3 Teach Yourself Guide To Numismatics, bought when I was about 15 years old. :-) Money, A History ISBN 0-312-21212-7 Ancient Greece, A Handbook. ISBN 0-7509-1973-6 Electrum was mined from the sands of some rivers in western Turkey. All of the above state that it's a naturally occurring alloy, three don't mention the proportions but one gives the content as 3/4 gold to 1/4 silver. Do you accept that it's a naturally occurring alloy as this is not clear from your post. Are you just discussing the metal mix? Billy A quick google confirms the 75/25 mix. Billy http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Electrum |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Reid Goldsborough wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 13:24:24 GMT, "note.boy" wrote: The electrum of the early Greek coinage was a naturally occurring alloy of gold and silver at 3/4 gold to 1/4 silver. This is not true. The electrum in the earliest Lydian and Greek coinage has a lower gold content than this, according to all of the metallurgical studies I've seen in the literature. And it wasn't standardized either, not at the percentage you say above or any other percentage. Where did you read this stuff? -- Email: (delete "remove this") Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos To quote a few lines of `Greek Coinage' by J G Milne (Oxford 1931): (quoting Aristotle in relation to his account of the evolution of economic relations among men and specifically in the context of measures of `exchange' and trade in general) "For these pursuits, as Aristotle says, it was necessary to find a convenient measure of exchange....... So the Ionian merchants found a commodity which answered their purposes.... - electrum, a natural alloy of gold and silver obtained from the beds of some rivers near at hand - and made this the basis of their standard of values." "but a novel feature soon appeared on these lumps of electrum which were passed for purposes of trade, in the form of distinctive stamps impressed upon them. At first these were little more than punch marks on the surface, but gradually became a design into which one side of the lump of metal was moulded."....etc. Thus, it would be safe to assume that the birth of the first coinage (as in `the very earliest')involved naturally occurring electrum and not a mix made by man. No? Ian further recommended reading : P Gardner `A History of Ancient Coinage' (Oxford 1918) |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 25 May 2005 14:31:18 GMT, "note.boy"
wrote: It is true otherwise I wouldn't have posted it, every mention of "electrum" that I've seen in coin books describes it as a naturally occurring alloy of gold and silver. This is misinformation, my good man. It's information that's simplified and apparently repeated. Those who have actually tested early electrum coins or who are on top of such testing by others would strongly disagree, such as Keyser and Clark in their chapter "Analyzing and Interpreting the Metallurgy of Early Electrum Coins" in the 2001 book Hacksilber to Coinage: New Insights into the Monetary History of the Near East and Greece, Wallace in his chapter "Remarks on the Value and Standards of Early Electrum Coins" in the same book, Ramage and Craddock in their 2000 book King Croesus' Gold: Excavations at Sardis and the History of Gold Refining, Crowell et al. in their article "Analyses of the Lydian Electrum, Gold and Silver Coinages" in the 1998 issue of Metallurgy in Numismatics, etc., etc. The gold content of early electrum coins is considerably less than the gold content of naturally occurring electrum found in the places where these coins were minted. The naturally occurring electrum was diluted with silver. I cover all this in a bit of detail he http://rg.ancients.info/lion/article.html The ANS is currently undertaking a project where it is metallurgically testing the early electrum coins in its own collection. -- Email: (delete "remove this") Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
All very interesting my good man I'm sure but you have failed to supply
the percentages of the alloy. Is it close to 75/25 or not? Do the sources you quote state that it's a naturally occurring alloy or not? As a naturally occurring alloy some variation is bound to occur. The early Greeks that used electrum for coin making were not capable of refining natural electrum to "pure" gold. This bit of your post makes no sense, "The gold content of early electrum coins is considerably less than the gold content of naturally occurring electrum found in the places where these coins were minted. The naturally occurring electrum was diluted with silver." As only naturally occurring electrum was used by the makers of early coins, they could not refine it and did not dilute it with more silver, it was used "as found". The variation in the gold content resulted in non local electrum coins being discounted in trade. Earlier in this thread you gave me the impression that you were unaware that electrum was a naturally occurring alloy. Billy Reid Goldsborough wrote: On Wed, 25 May 2005 14:31:18 GMT, "note.boy" wrote: It is true otherwise I wouldn't have posted it, every mention of "electrum" that I've seen in coin books describes it as a naturally occurring alloy of gold and silver. This is misinformation, my good man. It's information that's simplified and apparently repeated. Those who have actually tested early electrum coins or who are on top of such testing by others would strongly disagree, such as Keyser and Clark in their chapter "Analyzing and Interpreting the Metallurgy of Early Electrum Coins" in the 2001 book Hacksilber to Coinage: New Insights into the Monetary History of the Near East and Greece, Wallace in his chapter "Remarks on the Value and Standards of Early Electrum Coins" in the same book, Ramage and Craddock in their 2000 book King Croesus' Gold: Excavations at Sardis and the History of Gold Refining, Crowell et al. in their article "Analyses of the Lydian Electrum, Gold and Silver Coinages" in the 1998 issue of Metallurgy in Numismatics, etc., etc. The gold content of early electrum coins is considerably less than the gold content of naturally occurring electrum found in the places where these coins were minted. The naturally occurring electrum was diluted with silver. I cover all this in a bit of detail he http://rg.ancients.info/lion/article.html The ANS is currently undertaking a project where it is metallurgically testing the early electrum coins in its own collection. -- Email: (delete "remove this") Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"note.boy" wrote:
All very interesting my good man I'm sure but you have failed to supply the percentages of the alloy. Is it close to 75/25 or not? Do the sources you quote state that it's a naturally occurring alloy or not? As a naturally occurring alloy some variation is bound to occur. The early Greeks that used electrum for coin making were not capable of refining natural electrum to "pure" gold. This bit of your post makes no sense, "The gold content of early electrum coins is considerably less than the gold content of naturally occurring electrum found in the places where these coins were minted. The naturally occurring electrum was diluted with silver." As only naturally occurring electrum was used by the makers of early coins, they could not refine it and did not dilute it with more silver, it was used "as found". The variation in the gold content resulted in non local electrum coins being discounted in trade. Earlier in this thread you gave me the impression that you were unaware that electrum was a naturally occurring alloy. Billy Welcome to the Land of Reid. Isn't it odd to see someone speaking authoritatively when they are obviously being schooled by yourself? ;-) Alan 'traveled there extensively' Reid Goldsborough wrote: On Wed, 25 May 2005 14:31:18 GMT, "note.boy" wrote: It is true otherwise I wouldn't have posted it, every mention of "electrum" that I've seen in coin books describes it as a naturally occurring alloy of gold and silver. This is misinformation, my good man. It's information that's simplified and apparently repeated. Those who have actually tested early electrum coins or who are on top of such testing by others would strongly disagree, such as Keyser and Clark in their chapter "Analyzing and Interpreting the Metallurgy of Early Electrum Coins" in the 2001 book Hacksilber to Coinage: New Insights into the Monetary History of the Near East and Greece, Wallace in his chapter "Remarks on the Value and Standards of Early Electrum Coins" in the same book, Ramage and Craddock in their 2000 book King Croesus' Gold: Excavations at Sardis and the History of Gold Refining, Crowell et al. in their article "Analyses of the Lydian Electrum, Gold and Silver Coinages" in the 1998 issue of Metallurgy in Numismatics, etc., etc. The gold content of early electrum coins is considerably less than the gold content of naturally occurring electrum found in the places where these coins were minted. The naturally occurring electrum was diluted with silver. I cover all this in a bit of detail he http://rg.ancients.info/lion/article.html The ANS is currently undertaking a project where it is metallurgically testing the early electrum coins in its own collection. -- Email: (delete "remove this") Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 25 May 2005 16:05:38 GMT, "note.boy"
wrote: All very interesting my good man I'm sure but you have failed to supply the percentages of the alloy. Actually, I do state this, not in a post in this thread but at the page of mine I pointed you to: "These coins have a higher content of both silver and copper than naturally occurring electrum. Western Anatolian electrum/gold has a gold content of 70 to 90 percent, while these coins have a gold content of 50 to 60 percent, with most of those that have been analyzed consisting of around 53 percent gold." The early Greeks that used electrum for coin making were not capable of refining natural electrum to "pure" gold. This also is not true, I'm afraid. To put it more accurate, some scholars believe that the early Greeks and Lydians did in fact have the technology to refine pure gold. I'll point again to the page of mine I pointed you to earlier: "The archeological evidence suggests that pure gold may have been refined at Sardis [where the first coins were likely minted] as early as the third millennium BC, according to G. Hanfmann, "Lydian Culture and Society," Sardis from Prehistoric to Roman Times, edited by G. Hanfmann, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1983, p. 76. Furthermore, textual evidence suggests that pure gold was being refined in Mesopotamia in the second millennium BC, according to P. Keyser and D. Clark, "Analyzing and Interpreting the Metallurgy of Early Electrum Coins," Hacksilberto Coinage: New Insights into the Monetary History of the Near East and Greece, American Numismatic Society, New York, 2001, p. 110. Hanfmann pointed out that there's no proof of continuity into the first millennium BC, though it seems unlikely that such an important technology would have been lost even during the "dark age" that followed the fall of the Hittite empire c. 1200 BC. This bit of your post makes no sense, "The gold content of early electrum coins is considerably less than the gold content of naturally occurring electrum found in the places where these coins were minted. The naturally occurring electrum was diluted with silver." As only naturally occurring electrum was used by the makers of early coins, they could not refine it and did not dilute it with more silver, it was used "as found". The variation in the gold content resulted in non local electrum coins being discounted in trade. This again is not true. It's nearly certain that the first coins were made with naturally occurring electrum that had been diluted with silver. What's more, the first coins were not used in trade or commerce, according to the archeological evidence, as I point out. Earlier in this thread you gave me the impression that you were unaware that electrum was a naturally occurring alloy. Billy Read the page I pointed you to, please, before making wild statements like this. I'm very much aware that electrum occurred naturally! -- Email: (delete "remove this") Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 25 May 2005 15:29:58 GMT, Ian
wrote: To quote a few lines of `Greek Coinage' by J G Milne (Oxford 1931): (quoting Aristotle in relation to his account of the evolution of economic relations among men and specifically in the context of measures of `exchange' and trade in general) "For these pursuits, as Aristotle says, it was necessary to find a convenient measure of exchange....... So the Ionian merchants found a commodity which answered their purposes.... - electrum, a natural alloy of gold and silver obtained from the beds of some rivers near at hand - and made this the basis of their standard of values." "but a novel feature soon appeared on these lumps of electrum which were passed for purposes of trade, in the form of distinctive stamps impressed upon them. At first these were little more than punch marks on the surface, but gradually became a design into which one side of the lump of metal was moulded."....etc. Thus, it would be safe to assume that the birth of the first coinage (as in `the very earliest')involved naturally occurring electrum and not a mix made by man. No? I'm afraid this is old "knowledge," no longer valid. As I pointed out on my Web page on the first coins (which is based on two published articles of mine), it's now fairly certain that Aristotle was talking about how coins had evolved to be used in his time and extrapolating backward, incorrectly, to the first coinage. The first coins were not used as coins were used in Aristotle's time, to facilitate commerce and trade, according to current archeological evidence, which didn't exist 75 years ago when Milne wrote the above. -- Email: (delete "remove this") Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|