If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Scottishmoney wrote: Definately not slabbed: http://www.geocities.com/scottishmon...usaartemis.jpg Huh. Show-off. ;-) I just looked at my inventory here and discovered that I have a coin dating from the 6th-5th century B.C., an AR diobol from Miletos, Ionia, "the intellectual and commercial center of the Greek world before Athens rose to prominence": http://members.aol.com:/ankaaz/pictures/miletosx.jpg ~Anka |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On 23 May 2005 16:59:52 -0700, "Anka" wrote:
Scottishmoney wrote: Definately not slabbed: http://www.geocities.com/scottishmon...usaartemis.jpg Huh. Show-off. ;-) I just looked at my inventory here and discovered that I have a coin dating from the 6th-5th century B.C., an AR diobol from Miletos, Ionia, "the intellectual and commercial center of the Greek world before Athens rose to prominence": http://members.aol.com:/ankaaz/pictures/miletosx.jpg ~Anka Since the coin isn't slabbed, do you have any knowledge of its previous owners. Was it found buried or has it been in a collection since it was originally minted? I can't quite get my mind wrapped around how these coins remain in pristine or even pretty nice condition for all the years. Where have they been? Please educate me. Thanks, Cliff |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
On 23 May 2005 16:59:52 -0700, "Anka" wrote:
I just looked at my inventory here and discovered that I have a coin dating from the 6th-5th century B.C., an AR diobol from Miletos, Ionia, "the intellectual and commercial center of the Greek world before Athens rose to prominence": http://members.aol.com:/ankaaz/pictures/miletosx.jpg These Miletos twelfth staters are the earliest inexpensive coins, and yours is a nice specimen. Your photo/scan though makes it look more like a bronze than a silver coin. It has a false orange cast, possibly a result of your using regular incandescent lightbulbs for lighting without compensating for it. At any rate, this is how orangey pics like this often happen. I agree that encapsulation makes little sense to me for ancient coins, and most collectors feel this way, which is the reason it's used relatively infrequently, as a percentage of total coin sales, compared with U.S. coins. Collectors of ancients like to handle their coins -- it's part of the enjoyment. You don't have the same almost anal fear about touching a coin's surfaces as you have with U.S. coins. Coins were minted to be touched, to be passed from one hand to another. But more than the slab itself is the knowledge. Attributing and authenticating ancient coins requires specialized knowledge, and there have been many, many reports of coins incorrectly attributed in their slab. On the other hand, slabs themselves can be attractive, and I don't begrudge anyone if they prefer to have their coins stored this way. To each her own. -- Email: (delete "remove this") Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Cliff wrote: Since the coin isn't slabbed, do you have any knowledge of its previous owners. Was it found buried or has it been in a collection since it was originally minted? I can't quite get my mind wrapped around how these coins remain in pristine or even pretty nice condition for all the years. Where have they been? Please educate me. Thanks, Cliff This particular coin from Miletos came with no provenance, except perhaps the cryptic little notations on the back of the flip. Coin collecting has been popular since before the Renaissance, but many (dare I say most?) ancient coins have histories that go back no further than the most recent owner (maybe a museum or a wealthy collector whose numismatic cache was sold at auction) so it's virtually impossible to establish a lengthy provenance. Oftentimes, the flip or tag that comes with the ancient coin can give you a clue as to its ownership history. Sometimes, the dealer can offer information about the coin's previous owner or its origin, especially if the dealer has contacts who supply him/her with newly found or acquired ancients. Sometimes, the coin purchased is a specimen from a hoard that was recently unearthed, or one of many from a collection sold at auction. Many of the ancients on the market today have been stored in someone's cabinet for a number of years. Some of these acquire a kind of patina called "old cabinet toning," which can be a very desirable quality in a coin. Coins that have been dug up can be either sold "as is" or curated (a euphemism for cleaned). There is no guarantee that a -slabbed- ancient has a documented pedigree. I own a couple of ancients from well known numismatists (Vlasto and Curtis) and one that came from Boston's Museum of Fine Arts, but most of my coins are, as Alan would say, orphans. Hope this helps, Cliff. ~Anka |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Reid Goldsborough wrote: These Miletos twelfth staters are the earliest inexpensive coins, and yours is a nice specimen. Your photo/scan though makes it look more like a bronze than a silver coin. It has a false orange cast, possibly a result of your using regular incandescent lightbulbs for lighting without compensating for it. At any rate, this is how orangey pics like this often happen. You assume that I took the photo. I did not. ~Anka |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
On 24 May 2005 09:02:55 -0700, "Anka" wrote:
You assume that I took the photo. I did not. I actually didn't assume this, which is why I said "possibly." At any rate, you can easily correct for the orange cast even though you didn't take the photo yourself, if you have an image editing program, to make your coin (a nice one) look like the silver coin it is rather than a bronze coin. I agree that these Miletos twelfths are very cool coins. They're one of my areas, and I've delved into them fairly deeply, putting up a page about them he http://rg.ancients.info/lion/miletos.html -- Email: (delete "remove this") Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
On 24 May 2005 08:59:49 -0700, "Anka" wrote:
Cliff wrote: Since the coin isn't slabbed, do you have any knowledge of its previous owners. Was it found buried or has it been in a collection since it was originally minted? I can't quite get my mind wrapped around how these coins remain in pristine or even pretty nice condition for all the years. Where have they been? Please educate me. Thanks, Cliff This particular coin from Miletos came with no provenance, except perhaps the cryptic little notations on the back of the flip. Coin collecting has been popular since before the Renaissance, but many (dare I say most?) ancient coins have histories that go back no further than the most recent owner (maybe a museum or a wealthy collector whose numismatic cache was sold at auction) so it's virtually impossible to establish a lengthy provenance. Oftentimes, the flip or tag that comes with the ancient coin can give you a clue as to its ownership history. Sometimes, the dealer can offer information about the coin's previous owner or its origin, especially if the dealer has contacts who supply him/her with newly found or acquired ancients. Sometimes, the coin purchased is a specimen from a hoard that was recently unearthed, or one of many from a collection sold at auction. Many of the ancients on the market today have been stored in someone's cabinet for a number of years. Some of these acquire a kind of patina called "old cabinet toning," which can be a very desirable quality in a coin. Coins that have been dug up can be either sold "as is" or curated (a euphemism for cleaned). There is no guarantee that a -slabbed- ancient has a documented pedigree. I own a couple of ancients from well known numismatists (Vlasto and Curtis) and one that came from Boston's Museum of Fine Arts, but most of my coins are, as Alan would say, orphans. Hope this helps, Cliff. ~Anka Thanks Anka, that does help. Cliff |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Reid Goldsborough wrote: I actually didn't assume this, which is why I said "possibly." At any rate, you can easily correct for the orange cast even though you didn't take the photo yourself, if you have an image editing program, to make your coin (a nice one) look like the silver coin it is rather than a bronze coin. When I first saw the coin advertised I thought it was electrum, but since it was offered for only $100... sigh Anka |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
On 24 May 2005 12:52:31 -0700, "Anka" wrote:
When I first saw the coin advertised I thought it was electrum, but since it was offered for only $100... sigh *That* would be a deal. Early electrum in incredibly appealing. It's an odd metal, playing a controversial role in very early coinage. It appears that it resulted from gold being deliberately debased with silver, but was it done openly or surreptitiously? If you know, I'd appreciate it if you would tell me already. -- Email: (delete "remove this") Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Reid Goldsborough wrote: *That* would be a deal. Early electrum in incredibly appealing. It's an odd metal, playing a controversial role in very early coinage. It appears that it resulted from gold being deliberately debased with silver, but was it done openly or surreptitiously? If you know, I'd appreciate it if you would tell me already. I may be long in the tooth, Reid, but not old enough to have been there when they mined the stuff. Geez... ~Anka |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|