If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
AU58-BU Indian Head Grading Observations
Was notified by PCGS that a 1859 Indian Head Cent I sent for grading
had been give a grade of AU58. Not too long ago I sent in a 1955 Double Die Cent which still had some red mint luster and was given the same grade. From what I have seen at shows and on the internet PCGS appears to be really hard on copper coins. On the 1955 I could not see the "rub" and neither could my dealer. On the 1859 the coin was cracked out of a ANACS holder which had the appearance of being opened and resealed at one time. The grade on the holder was MS62. When I compare my Indian cents which are in NGC holders vs PCGS it appears to me that PCGS is usually 1-2 points lower on similar coins. I have also noticed that NGC will give a Indian Cent a designation of MS66 RB or MS66 Brown when I have never seen a Indian Cent from PCGS in those grades. I realize that PCGS coins usually get higher prices in the marketplace, howerver, the difference in price between AU58 and MS can be substantial no matter which company did the evaluation. The other thing I have noticed is most grading companies with the exception of PCGS tend to grade older (100+ years) coins more liberaly. I have seen coins by NGC, ANACS, ICS, SEGS which have been graded MS which in fact had they been modern coins they would have received AU status. Anyone else noticed this disparity? David |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Ira Stein
spoke thusly... David wrote: When I compare my Indian cents which are in NGC holders vs PCGS it appears to me that PCGS is usually 1-2 points lower on similar coins. snip PCGS is much tougher in small cents than ANY of the other grading services. That's why they command such a premium on the marketplace. I had a red NGC 64 in MS-63, some minor spotting, as expected, and my customer wanted in a PCGS holder. Told him it was abit risky. He wanted it done regardless, so I cracked it out and sent raw to PCGS. Came back AU58! That coin had no wear under a 7X glass! This was about 2 years ago and PCGS is even tougher now. I don't consider myself a slab basher but...They graded an MS coin with minor spotting as a circulated coin?!?!?! That sounds more than tough. -- Stu Miller The Grading Challenge...New coin this week: http://www.TheStujoeCollection.com/grade/ Director, RCC Mint http://www.TheStujoeCollection.com/rccmint |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Stu Miller wrote:
I don't consider myself a slab basher but...They graded an MS coin with minor spotting as a circulated coin?!?!?! That sounds more than tough. actually that's not uncommon,. Yo could send it in 3 minths later and perhaps get a MS-62. All the grading companies "market grade" tehse days, so if the primary grader felt the coin was worth only AU58 money in teh marketplace because of the spots, he would give it a "not quite" unc grade of AU58. Yet another grader at the ssme company might reve=ceivce it another taime and call it a highergrade, not discounting the spots at all forthe grade. This is a problem for ALL the grading companies, not just PCGS. PCGS is, however, tougher on most series than the other companies. At least, that's what I have observed in teh past few years. David Hall, CEO of PCGS, has publicly stated that he wants only the nicest coins in PCGS holders. Well, Ithink that attitude has influennced he graders. If you do object to a grade, you can pay extra $$ for Presidential review. Sometimes you can get an upgrade that way. I have. Ira Stein |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I should clarify my last post on this subject.
I don't mean to imply that you can BUY a hiigher grade, you cannot. Many times David Hall will look at the coin and simply agree with the grading team. Other times he'll walk it around the floor and seek a consesus among the graders. If the consensus is that the coin should be upgraded due to an overly strict initial grade, they will do so. That's the problem with all grading. It's objective AND subjective. Repeatability is often an issue. PCGS errs as they all do. When they have erred in recent years, however, they tend to err on the side of conservatsim. That's why when you see runaway prices on coins at auction, they are often in a PCGS holder (the $27,800 1912S PCGS MS-65 red Lincoln Cent comes to mind). The winning bidder, a well known dealer, thought he could get a one point upgrade. If he had done so, he had a buyer who would have paid $60,000 for the coin. So far it has NOT upgraded although it HAS been tried! He'll try again....and again..and again if necessary. I saw the coin and I thought it was a very high end MS-65 and I would have paid 2.5 X wholesale asked for it. It went for almost 10X my limit. But I had no buyer for it at $60,000, the bidder did with a 1 point upgrade. Ira Stein |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Ira Stein" wrote in message
I should clarify my last post on this subject. I don't mean to imply that you can BUY a hiigher grade, you cannot. Many times David Hall will look at the coin and simply agree with the grading team. Other times he'll walk it around the floor and seek a consesus among the graders. If the consensus is that the coin should be upgraded due to an overly strict initial grade, they will do so. snip . Ira Stein Ira, Do the other graders actually over rule a fellow grader? *I* would think they wouldn't want to potentially embarrass a peer / co-worker. I guess it does happen, as you said you got an upgrade. I just find it odd that the graders would second guess one of their own (same company). Does David Hall leave the coin in the slab when showing it around? Ed |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Ed asks:
Ira, Do the other graders actually over rule a fellow grader? *I* would think they wouldn't want to potentially embarrass a peer / co-worker. I guess it does happen, as you said you got an upgrade. I just find it odd that the graders would second guess one of their own (same company). Does David Hall leave the coin in the slab when showing it around? Ed It's left in the slab, but I imagine the previous grade is covered with opaque tape or a blank label. There are about 20 graders, so not all will agree, but in that way a consensus is obtained. Most of the time I imagine, Hall looks at the coin, and if he agrees with the grade, no consensus is sought. If he feels that a particularly tough call was made and he doesn't agree with it, then he asks for a consensus. He won't ask them to change the grade, just render a consensus opinion. If it's higher than the previous opinion, then the grade gets changed. Ira Stein |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Memorex surprise, Radio Trash crap | DeserTBoB | 8 Track Tapes | 7 | October 17th 04 02:13 PM |
CPK Dolls & Misc Items--- FS | Sue from NY | General | 0 | August 28th 03 05:53 PM |
TSC: New Grading Challenge (Indian Head Cent)...Numismatic Idol continues | Stujoe | Coins | 0 | July 4th 03 10:04 PM |
Indian Head Penny | Bruce Remick | Coins | 1 | July 3rd 03 02:31 PM |
What Is Wrong With This Indian Head auction item? | reknib | Coins | 0 | July 3rd 03 02:30 AM |