A collecting forum. CollectingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » CollectingBanter forum » Collecting newsgroups » Coins
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NYT ed. opposes Reagan likeness on coins and currency



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 10th 04, 04:50 PM
Edwin Johnston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default NYT ed. opposes Reagan likeness on coins and currency

The New york Times editorializes against putting Ronald Reagan on coins and
currency today:

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/10/opinion/10THU3.html
(registration required)

Honors for President Reagan
Published: June 10, 2004

Alexander Hamilton, the founding father who was the nation's first Treasury
secretary, is in dire need of a lobbyist to head off the rush in Washington
to remove him from the $10 bill to make way for former President Ronald
Reagan. There are plenty of competing proposals to put Mr. Reagan's portrait
on the dime, the half-dollar or other bills. They seem just as motivated by
politicians' eagerness to piggyback onto Mr. Reagan's popularity as they are
by any genuine desire to honor him.

Mr. Reagan was certainly among the most important presidents of the last
century, and the outpouring of grief this week is a tribute. Washington's
airport and the largest federal building built since the Pentagon are
already named after him, as are an aircraft carrier and hundreds of other
sites nationwide.

There will be plenty of ways Americans can further honor his memory in the
months ahead. But Congress should not rush to alter American currency as a
reaction to the passions of the moment. Even Mr. Reagan's most ardent fans
should be calling for restraint, lest we wind up with a frenzy of new but
short-lived currency designs. Some years need to pass so the country has
more perspective on the Reagan presidency. Whatever honor the Treasury then
accords him will be more meaningful, not to mention more enduring.

And as for Hamilton, he should stay on that $10 bill. Mr. Reagan himself was
fond of citing Hamilton, the brilliant immigrant from the West Indies who
helped George Washington lead the Continental Army and then became the most
effective proponent of binding the former colonies into a new nation with a
strong government. True, Alexander Hamilton was never elected president. But
the nation has certainly never worked under the assumption that all of the
greatest Americans lived in the White House. Otherwise, Benjamin Franklin
will need a Washington lobbyist, too.


Ads
  #2  
Old June 10th 04, 08:14 PM
ELurio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On the back of a "Coin World" newspaper the other week, there was an ad for a
book on prospective designs for currency. It had a $1 FRN with Thomas Edison on
it and looked really fine. Perhaps it is time to change everything.

eric l.
  #3  
Old June 10th 04, 09:11 PM
Richard L. Hall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hurray for common sense! Reagan should be put on a commemorative coin and
not on a circulating coin. And certainly not on a $10 bill.


--
Richard
My coin Links:
http://home.netcom.com/~richlh/Coins/MyCoinLinks.htm

http://home.netcom.com/~richlh




"Edwin Johnston" wrote in message
...
The New york Times editorializes against putting Ronald Reagan on coins

and
currency today:

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/10/opinion/10THU3.html
(registration required)

Honors for President Reagan
Published: June 10, 2004

Alexander Hamilton, the founding father who was the nation's first

Treasury
secretary, is in dire need of a lobbyist to head off the rush in

Washington
to remove him from the $10 bill to make way for former President Ronald
Reagan. There are plenty of competing proposals to put Mr. Reagan's

portrait
on the dime, the half-dollar or other bills. They seem just as motivated

by
politicians' eagerness to piggyback onto Mr. Reagan's popularity as they

are
by any genuine desire to honor him.

Mr. Reagan was certainly among the most important presidents of the last
century, and the outpouring of grief this week is a tribute. Washington's
airport and the largest federal building built since the Pentagon are
already named after him, as are an aircraft carrier and hundreds of other
sites nationwide.

There will be plenty of ways Americans can further honor his memory in the
months ahead. But Congress should not rush to alter American currency as a
reaction to the passions of the moment. Even Mr. Reagan's most ardent fans
should be calling for restraint, lest we wind up with a frenzy of new but
short-lived currency designs. Some years need to pass so the country has
more perspective on the Reagan presidency. Whatever honor the Treasury

then
accords him will be more meaningful, not to mention more enduring.

And as for Hamilton, he should stay on that $10 bill. Mr. Reagan himself

was
fond of citing Hamilton, the brilliant immigrant from the West Indies who
helped George Washington lead the Continental Army and then became the

most
effective proponent of binding the former colonies into a new nation with

a
strong government. True, Alexander Hamilton was never elected president.

But
the nation has certainly never worked under the assumption that all of the
greatest Americans lived in the White House. Otherwise, Benjamin Franklin
will need a Washington lobbyist, too.




  #4  
Old June 10th 04, 09:31 PM
Keith Fletcher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Liberty. Please, Liberty.

--K

"Edwin Johnston" wrote in message
...
The New york Times editorializes against putting Ronald Reagan on coins

and
currency today:

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/10/opinion/10THU3.html
(registration required)

Honors for President Reagan
Published: June 10, 2004

Alexander Hamilton, the founding father who was the nation's first

Treasury
secretary, is in dire need of a lobbyist to head off the rush in

Washington
to remove him from the $10 bill to make way for former President Ronald
Reagan. There are plenty of competing proposals to put Mr. Reagan's

portrait
on the dime, the half-dollar or other bills. They seem just as motivated

by
politicians' eagerness to piggyback onto Mr. Reagan's popularity as they

are
by any genuine desire to honor him.

Mr. Reagan was certainly among the most important presidents of the last
century, and the outpouring of grief this week is a tribute. Washington's
airport and the largest federal building built since the Pentagon are
already named after him, as are an aircraft carrier and hundreds of other
sites nationwide.

There will be plenty of ways Americans can further honor his memory in the
months ahead. But Congress should not rush to alter American currency as a
reaction to the passions of the moment. Even Mr. Reagan's most ardent fans
should be calling for restraint, lest we wind up with a frenzy of new but
short-lived currency designs. Some years need to pass so the country has
more perspective on the Reagan presidency. Whatever honor the Treasury

then
accords him will be more meaningful, not to mention more enduring.

And as for Hamilton, he should stay on that $10 bill. Mr. Reagan himself

was
fond of citing Hamilton, the brilliant immigrant from the West Indies who
helped George Washington lead the Continental Army and then became the

most
effective proponent of binding the former colonies into a new nation with

a
strong government. True, Alexander Hamilton was never elected president.

But
the nation has certainly never worked under the assumption that all of the
greatest Americans lived in the White House. Otherwise, Benjamin Franklin
will need a Washington lobbyist, too.




  #5  
Old June 10th 04, 09:36 PM
Bob Flaminio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Keith Fletcher wrote:
Liberty. Please, Liberty.


Give me Liberty, or give me ... ?

--
Bob


  #6  
Old June 10th 04, 09:38 PM
Bernhard Rich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thats the new york Slimes for you.

  #7  
Old June 10th 04, 09:47 PM
ELurio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jail?
  #8  
Old June 10th 04, 10:45 PM
Fred Shecter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Debt

--
"""Remove "zorch" from address (2 places) to reply.
"Bob Flaminio" wrote in message ...
Keith Fletcher wrote:
Liberty. Please, Liberty.


Give me Liberty, or give me ... ?

--
Bob


  #10  
Old June 10th 04, 11:55 PM
Brad
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Oh yeah that would be great, a President that stepped on the working man
ever chance he got put on the $10. He killed unions, ran up the debt, and
stepped all over poor and working class Americans. Maybe they should put him
on the $100 so the working class will not have to look at his ass very
often. The last 2 years of his Presidency his wife ran the show for him
anyway, usually based on if the stars where in line that day. The best thing
he did was bring his stupid one liner carry over from the movies to the
office, and people bought into the stupid ****.

Brad

"Bernhard Rich" wrote in message
...
Thats the new york Slimes for you.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CollectingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.