Thanks for the input. I may take it to a local dealer on Friday or
Saturday.

--
*
/?\
/___\
-O=O-
^
AS & His Magic Hat

A conclusion is simply the place
where you decided to stop thinking.
"James Higby" heezerbumfrool[at]hotmail[dot]com wrote in message
...
I've compared your scan with the pix in Fletcher. None of the overdate
pix matches with regard to the relationship between the 8s and the shield
ball. In fact, it looks more like one of the pix of 1882. Take a real
careful look at that 4th digit under a glass.

My unofficial, unscientific guess is that only 1 or 2 out of a hundred
alleged 1883/2 shield nickels actually are the overdate - and I've looked
at a ton of them.

"Aladdin Sane" wrote in message
...

What do you think?
--
*
/?\
/___\
-O=O-
^
AS & His Magic Hat

A conclusion is simply the place
where you decided to stop thinking.