Bush tries to be Jimmy Carter, fumbles ball to Rice, who won't make a first down
George Grapman wrote:
DeserTBoB wrote:
Can you believe that ignoramus trying to broker a Middle Eastern
peace deal?? HE'S the one directly responsible for the complete
disaster we've got over there right now! Now that he's obviously in
trouble, he'll try to do a shovel pass to Condom Rice, whose track
record thus far is like the rest of her previous
careers...well-cloaked failures. It appears that Bush has been
finally realizing that he's poised to go down as the worst president
in US history and is trying to salvage what little he can of his
"legacy." He probably (and delusionally) reasons that, since Jimmy
Carter is internationally well regarded for his efforts in the
region in the '70s, he can do the same thing by making these
Annapolis "talks" into an "atta boy," and it will somehow wipe out
all his "aww ****s" over the past seven years. Ain't gonna
happen...historians will do their thing, and George W. Bush will go
down in the permanent historical record as being actually inferior
to both Millard Fillmore and Warren G. Harding...quite a feat in
itself, seeing what dunderheads those two losers were! Poor choice,
trying to get Condom to cover for him, because she'll
just **** off the Arab states even more and we'll have even more
problems in the region. China must be happy...Bush's Middle Eastern
screwups have pretty much diverted Rice's (and the rest of the neocon
morons') attention away from them, so they can wreck our economy even
further without notice from them until it's too late...and we may
already be there.
Big question is...now that the Bushies and neocons have set about
destroying the US in so many ways, who can put the pieces back
together again after he's gone...if anyone?
He couldn't even pronounce their names.
He ignored the key dispute in the Middle East.
Where the hell has he been for seven years?
|