A copy for sure
 

http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI...tem=2211719433

Seller says they don't know. Someone thinks its worth $7.00 at least.

On 25 Dec 2003 17:59:28 GMT, (JSTONE9352) wrote:

http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI...tem=2211719433

Seller says they don't know. Someone thinks its worth $7.00 at least.

Course it's a copy. All black printing on crinkly and heavy brown
stained paper! I'm sure I have an AK note with that same SN; though
without the reverse side!

Padraic.

la cieurgeourea provoer mal trasfu
ast meiyoer ke 'l andrext ben trasfu.

not a copy....called a reproduction or replica.....
symantics.....
happy holidays
Jan

"JSTONE9352" wrote in message
...
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI...tem=2211719433

Seller says they don't know. Someone thinks its worth $7.00 at least.

not a copy....called a reproduction or replica.....
symantics.....
happy holidays
Jan

Please.... don't get technical on us.

"JSTONE9352" wrote in message
...

not a copy....called a reproduction or replica.....
symantics.....
happy holidays
Jan

Please.... don't get technical on us.

Especially if you cannot spell it correctly. It is semantics.

Tony

"Jim" wrote in message
...
(JSTONE9352) adds....

Please.... don't get technical on us.

Technical, schmecknical. Copy and repro are one in the same. Replica, in
most
peoples minds, connotes a different sized copy.

Not necessarily smaller. Replica is also defined in the dictionary as a
copy or duplicate.

Tony


Oh and it's s"e"mantics w/an e, not a y, but who's being critical......8^)

Always here for my fellow syngraphist or oenophile.
--=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=--

"A.E. Gelat" is still wandering the halls of Usenet
unsupervised.....

Not necessarily smaller.

Where did anyone use the modifier smaller in any of this post?

I said....

Replica, in most peoples minds, connotes a different sized copy.

Hmmmmm.......Those voices Tony, those voices.

Always here for my fellow syngraphist or oenophile.
--=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=--

One of the replies mentioned that a replica is reduced in size, and my
comment was on that.

Tony

"Jim" wrote in message
...
"A.E. Gelat" is still wandering the halls of
Usenet
unsupervised.....

Not necessarily smaller.

Where did anyone use the modifier smaller in any of this post?

I said....

Replica, in most peoples minds, connotes a different sized copy.

Hmmmmm.......Those voices Tony, those voices.

Always here for my fellow syngraphist or oenophile.
--=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=--

On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 01:43:48 GMT, "Jan" wrote:

not a copy....called a reproduction or replica.....
symantics.....

Yeah. Or a counterfeit! Either way, it was run through some kind of
copy machine! And not a very good process at that!!

Padraic.

la cieurgeourea provoer mal trasfu
ast meiyoer ke 'l andrext ben trasfu.