"nearly mint" he says
 

A bit of optimistic grading going on here I think.

It's hard to believe that the front, not bad in the scan, and the back,
horrible in the scan, belong to the same note.

More evidence of why no one should bid on a note that only shows the
front as the back is always worse than the front, sometimes a lot
worse. Billy


http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...2846 266&rd=1

On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:26:52 +0000, note.boy wrote:

A bit of optimistic grading going on here I think.

It's hard to believe that the front, not bad in the scan, and the back,
horrible in the scan, belong to the same note.

Can't even believe the same guy made the scans! One looks nice, and the
other looks dark and like something I threw away yesterday. Go figure!


More evidence of why no one should bid on a note that only shows the
front as the back is always worse than the front, sometimes a lot
worse. Billy


http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...2846 266&rd=1